PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQA vs. CHPY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQA vs. CHPY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF (QQA) and YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF (CHPY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQA achieves a 14.57% return, which is significantly lower than CHPY's 85.77% return.


QQA

1D
-0.10%
1M
7.03%
YTD
14.57%
6M
14.20%
1Y
32.22%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CHPY

1D
1.14%
1M
29.53%
YTD
85.77%
6M
85.49%
1Y
149.72%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQA vs. CHPY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between QQA and CHPY is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2025

0.78

The correlation between QQA and CHPY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQA vs. CHPY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQA
QQA Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
QQA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQA Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
QQA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQA Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

CHPY
CHPY Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
CHPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHPY Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
CHPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHPY Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQA vs. CHPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF (QQA) and YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF (CHPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QQACHPYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.57

5.47

-2.90

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.47

5.76

-2.29

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.81

-0.34

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.70

12.38

-8.69

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

16.59

47.28

-30.69

QQA vs. CHPY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQA Sharpe Ratio is 2.57, which is lower than the CHPY Sharpe Ratio of 5.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQA and CHPY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QQACHPYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.57

5.47

-2.90

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.18

4.83

-3.66

Drawdowns

QQA vs. CHPY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQA drawdown since its inception was -19.73%, which is greater than CHPY's maximum drawdown of -12.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQA and CHPY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQACHPYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.73%

-12.17%

-7.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.76%

-12.17%

+3.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.10%

0.00%

-0.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.44%

-1.98%

-0.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.95%

3.18%

-1.23%

Volatility

QQA vs. CHPY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF (QQA) is 2.91%, while YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF (CHPY) has a volatility of 11.23%. This indicates that QQA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQACHPYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.91%

11.23%

-8.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.68%

22.33%

-12.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.59%

27.59%

-15.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.27%

33.17%

-14.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.27%

33.17%

-14.90%

QQA vs. CHPY - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQA has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than CHPY's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

QQA vs. CHPY - Dividend Comparison

QQA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.29%, less than CHPY's 28.40% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
CHPY
YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF
28.40%28.19%0.00%
QQA
Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF
9.29%9.78%4.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


QQA and CHPY have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CHPY has higher volatility (11.23%) compared to QQA (2.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQA dropped -19.73% vs CHPY's -12.17%.

On 1-year performance, CHPY leads with 149.72% vs 32.22% for QQA. On fees, QQA is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, QQA has been the lower-risk option at 2.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, CHPY has performed better with a 149.72% return vs 32.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQA is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for CHPY.

CHPY has the higher dividend yield at 28.40%, compared with 9.29% for QQA.

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for QQA and 0.99% for CHPY.

CHPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.47 vs 2.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQA and CHPY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer