QQA vs. CHPY

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

QQA (Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF) and CHPY (YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, QQA returned 28.19% vs 134.57% for CHPY. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QQA charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for CHPY.

Performance

QQA vs. CHPY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF (QQA) and YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF (CHPY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQA achieves a 12.34% return, which is significantly lower than CHPY's 82.68% return.

QQA

• 1D: -1.80%
• 1M: 0.69%
• YTD: 12.34%
• 6M: 11.54%
• 1Y: 28.19%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CHPY

• 1D: -6.97%
• 1M: 10.89%
• YTD: 82.68%
• 6M: 81.99%
• 1Y: 134.57%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQA vs. CHPY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
QQA Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF	12.34%	23.43%
CHPY YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF	82.68%	56.76%

Correlation

The correlation between QQA and CHPY is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.77
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2025	0.79

The correlation between QQA and CHPY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

QQA vs. CHPY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQA

QQA Risk / Return Rank: 67
QQA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
QQA Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
QQA Omega Ratio Rank: 64
QQA Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
QQA Martin Ratio Rank: 76

CHPY

CHPY Risk / Return Rank: 95
CHPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
CHPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
CHPY Omega Ratio Rank: 94
CHPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
CHPY Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQA vs. CHPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF (QQA) and YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF (CHPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QQA	CHPY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.03	4.16	-2.12
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.74	4.30	-1.56
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.64	-0.27
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.23	11.13	-7.89
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.90	39.19	-25.29

QQA vs. CHPY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQA Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is lower than the CHPY Sharpe Ratio of 4.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQA and CHPY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QQA vs. CHPY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQA drawdown since its inception was -19.73%, which is greater than CHPY's maximum drawdown of -12.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQA and CHPY.

Drawdown Indicators

	QQA	CHPY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.73%	-12.19%	-7.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.76%	-12.17%	+3.41%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.14%	-6.97%	+4.83%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.53%	-2.14%	-0.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.03%	3.45%	-1.42%

Volatility

QQA vs. CHPY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF (QQA) is 6.67%, while YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF (CHPY) has a volatility of 19.72%. This indicates that QQA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QQA	CHPY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.67%	19.72%	-13.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.28%	27.95%	-16.67%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.95%	32.57%	-18.62%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.59%	36.37%	-17.78%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.59%	36.37%	-17.78%

QQA vs. CHPY - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQA has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than CHPY's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

QQA vs. CHPY - Dividend Comparison

QQA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.70%, less than CHPY's 29.64% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
CHPY YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF	29.64%	28.19%	0.00%
QQA Invesco QQQ Income Advantage ETF	9.70%	9.78%	4.29%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QQA and CHPY in my portfolio?

QQA and CHPY have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QQA or CHPY?

CHPY has higher volatility (19.72%) compared to QQA (6.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQA dropped -19.73% vs CHPY's -12.19%.

Which ETF is better, QQA or CHPY?

On 1-year performance, CHPY leads with 134.57% vs 28.19% for QQA. On fees, QQA is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, QQA has been the lower-risk option at 6.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QQA or CHPY?

Over the 1-year period, CHPY has performed better with a 134.57% return vs 28.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QQA or CHPY?

QQA is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for CHPY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QQA or CHPY?

CHPY has the higher dividend yield at 29.64%, compared with 9.70% for QQA.

What is the main difference between QQA and CHPY?

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for QQA and 0.99% for CHPY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CHPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.16 vs 2.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.