QPUX vs. SMH
QPUX (Defiance 2X Daily Long Pure Quantum ETF) and SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QPUX is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Defiance, while SMH is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. QPUX is actively managed, while SMH is passively managed. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QPUX charges 1.29%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for SMH.
Performance
QPUX vs. SMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QPUX achieves a -42.38% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 71.86% return.
QPUX
- 1D
- -16.04%
- 1M
- -43.68%
- YTD
- -42.38%
- 6M
- -52.28%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SMH
- 1D
- -0.50%
- 1M
- 7.39%
- YTD
- 71.86%
- 6M
- 69.95%
- 1Y
- 128.64%
- 3Y*
- 62.01%
- 5Y*
- 38.15%
- 10Y*
- 37.78%
QPUX vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QPUX Defiance 2X Daily Long Pure Quantum ETF | -42.38% | -55.09% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 71.86% | 26.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between QPUX and SMH is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 7, 2025 | 0.40 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QPUX vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank
QPUX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SMH
QPUX vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance 2X Daily Long Pure Quantum ETF (QPUX) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QPUX | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.55 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 8.67 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 31.31 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QPUX vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QPUX drawdown since its inception was -94.73%, which is greater than SMH's maximum drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QPUX and SMH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QPUX | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.73% | -84.96% | -9.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -14.93% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -35.74% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -45.30% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.30% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -88.57% | -7.47% | -81.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -69.08% | -41.00% | -28.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.12% | — |
Volatility
QPUX vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QPUX | SMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 19.07% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 29.12% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 201.87% | 34.88% | +166.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 201.87% | 35.82% | +166.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 201.87% | 32.96% | +168.91% |
QPUX vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison
QPUX has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than SMH's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
QPUX vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison
QPUX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QPUX Defiance 2X Daily Long Pure Quantum ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF | 0.18% | 0.31% | 0.44% | 0.60% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 0.69% | 1.50% | 1.88% | 1.43% | 0.80% | 2.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QPUX and SMH have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SMH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SMH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for QPUX.
SMH has the higher dividend yield at 0.18%, compared with 0.00% for QPUX.
QPUX is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while SMH is Semiconductors. They also come from different issuers: Defiance and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for QPUX and 0.35% for SMH.
Find the right allocation for QPUX and SMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer