QPUX vs. BCI
QPUX (Defiance 2X Daily Long Pure Quantum ETF) and BCI (abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QPUX is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Defiance, while BCI is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return. QPUX is actively managed, while BCI is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions. QPUX charges 1.29%/yr vs 0.26%/yr for BCI.
Performance
QPUX vs. BCI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QPUX achieves a -71.23% return, which is significantly lower than BCI's 20.43% return.
QPUX
- 1D
- -13.62%
- 1M
- -55.16%
- 6M
- -76.32%
- YTD
- -71.23%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BCI
- 1D
- -1.09%
- 1M
- 1.64%
- 6M
- 15.98%
- YTD
- 20.43%
- 1Y
- 29.04%
- 3Y*
- 12.49%
- 5Y*
- 10.14%
- 10Y*
- —
QPUX vs. BCI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QPUX Defiance 2X Daily Long Pure Quantum ETF | -71.23% | -55.09% |
BCI abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF | 20.43% | 10.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between QPUX and BCI is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 7, 2025 | -0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QPUX vs. BCI — Risk / Return Rank
QPUX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BCI
QPUX vs. BCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance 2X Daily Long Pure Quantum ETF (QPUX) and abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QPUX | BCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.30 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.97 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 6.44 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QPUX vs. BCI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QPUX drawdown since its inception was -94.73%, which is greater than BCI's maximum drawdown of -32.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QPUX and BCI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QPUX | BCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.73% | -32.69% | -62.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -14.82% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.82% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.50% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -94.29% | -9.22% | -85.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -70.47% | -11.99% | -58.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.52% | — |
Volatility
QPUX vs. BCI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QPUX | BCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.84% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 15.03% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 198.75% | 17.36% | +181.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 198.75% | 16.85% | +181.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 198.75% | 15.66% | +183.09% |
QPUX vs. BCI - Expense Ratio Comparison
QPUX has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than BCI's 0.26% expense ratio.
Dividends
QPUX vs. BCI - Dividend Comparison
QPUX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.69%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCI abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF | 13.69% | 16.49% | 3.29% | 3.93% | 19.98% | 19.43% | 0.68% | 1.47% | 1.13% | 5.02% |
QPUX Defiance 2X Daily Long Pure Quantum ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QPUX and BCI have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BCI is cheaper at 0.26% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BCI is cheaper with a 0.26% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for QPUX.
BCI has the higher dividend yield at 13.69%, compared with 0.00% for QPUX.
QPUX is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while BCI is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Aberdeen. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for QPUX and 0.26% for BCI.
Find the right allocation for QPUX and BCI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer