PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QPFF vs. FDG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QPFF vs. FDG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Century Quality Preferred ETF (QPFF) and American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF (FDG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


QPFF

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FDG

1D
-2.00%
1M
3.68%
YTD
7.52%
6M
9.17%
1Y
31.12%
3Y*
29.27%
5Y*
12.61%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QPFF vs. FDG - Yearly Performance Comparison


QPFF vs. FDG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QPFF
FDG

Financial Services

51.6%
4.7%

Utilities

5.5%
0.1%

Real Estate

4.1%

-

Communication Services

3.6%
21.5%

Consumer Cyclical

2.1%
17.1%

Industrials

1.2%
5.2%

Basic Materials

0.3%

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

0.6%

Healthcare

-

13.2%

Technology

-

37.7%

Financial Services

QPFF
51.6%
FDG
4.7%

Utilities

QPFF
5.5%
FDG
0.1%

Real Estate

QPFF
4.1%
FDG

-

Communication Services

QPFF
3.6%
FDG
21.5%

Consumer Cyclical

QPFF
2.1%
FDG
17.1%

Industrials

QPFF
1.2%
FDG
5.2%

Basic Materials

QPFF
0.3%
FDG

-

Consumer Defensive

QPFF

-

FDG

-

Energy

QPFF

-

FDG
0.6%

Healthcare

QPFF

-

FDG
13.2%

Technology

QPFF

-

FDG
37.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QPFF vs. FDG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QPFF

FDG
FDG Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
FDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDG Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
FDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDG Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QPFF vs. FDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Quality Preferred ETF (QPFF) and American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF (FDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

QPFF vs. FDG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QPFFFDGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.76

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.92

Drawdowns

QPFF vs. FDG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QPFF drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum FDG drawdown of -43.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QPFF and FDG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QPFFFDGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-43.69%

+43.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-3.13%

+3.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-13.43%

+13.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.45%

Volatility

QPFF vs. FDG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QPFFFDGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.00%

17.77%

-17.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.00%

24.67%

-24.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.00%

24.90%

-24.90%

QPFF vs. FDG - Expense Ratio Comparison

QPFF has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is lower than FDG's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

QPFF vs. FDG - Dividend Comparison

Neither QPFF nor FDG has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
FDG
American Century Focused Dynamic Growth ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.01%
QPFF
American Century Quality Preferred ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, QPFF is cheaper at 0.33% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QPFF is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for FDG.

QPFF and FDG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

QPFF is categorized as Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds, while FDG is Global Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for QPFF and 0.45% for FDG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QPFF and FDG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer