QPFF vs. CSPF
QPFF (American Century Quality Preferred ETF) and CSPF (Cohen & Steers Preferred and Income Opportunities Active ETF) are both Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. QPFF charges 0.33%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for CSPF.
Performance
QPFF vs. CSPF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
QPFF
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CSPF
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- 0.65%
- YTD
- 2.65%
- 6M
- 2.72%
- 1Y
- 9.14%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QPFF vs. CSPF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
QPFF American Century Quality Preferred ETF | 0.00% |
CSPF Cohen & Steers Preferred and Income Opportunities Active ETF | 0.89% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QPFF vs. CSPF — Risk / Return Rank
QPFF
CSPF
QPFF vs. CSPF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Quality Preferred ETF (QPFF) and Cohen & Steers Preferred and Income Opportunities Active ETF (CSPF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QPFF | CSPF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.26 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 1.96 | — |
Drawdowns
QPFF vs. CSPF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QPFF drawdown since its inception was 0.00%, smaller than the maximum CSPF drawdown of -3.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QPFF and CSPF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QPFF | CSPF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -3.06% | +3.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -3.06% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.32% | +0.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | 0.00% | -0.44% | +0.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.67% | — |
Volatility
QPFF vs. CSPF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QPFF | CSPF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.08% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 3.03% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00% | 4.07% | -4.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 4.17% | -4.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.00% | 4.17% | -4.17% |
QPFF vs. CSPF - Expense Ratio Comparison
QPFF has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is lower than CSPF's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
QPFF vs. CSPF - Dividend Comparison
QPFF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CSPF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.16%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CSPF Cohen & Steers Preferred and Income Opportunities Active ETF | 5.16% | 4.63% |
QPFF American Century Quality Preferred ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, QPFF is cheaper at 0.33% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QPFF is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for CSPF.
CSPF has the higher dividend yield at 5.16%, compared with 0.00% for QPFF.
They also come from different issuers: American Century and Cohen & Steers. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for QPFF and 0.59% for CSPF.
Find the right allocation for QPFF and CSPF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer