PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QNZIX vs. QAMNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

QNZIX vs. QAMNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AQR Trend Total Return Fund Class I (QNZIX) and Federated Hermes MDT Market Neutral A (QAMNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

QNZIX vs. QAMNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
QNZIX
AQR Trend Total Return Fund Class I
6.97%23.26%35.22%23.03%1.57%
QAMNX
Federated Hermes MDT Market Neutral A
1.36%10.00%17.33%4.71%7.49%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QNZIX achieves a 6.97% return, which is significantly higher than QAMNX's 1.36% return.


QNZIX

1D
0.94%
1M
-1.32%
YTD
6.97%
6M
11.69%
1Y
27.41%
3Y*
28.37%
5Y*
10Y*

QAMNX

1D
-0.05%
1M
-0.05%
YTD
1.36%
6M
5.54%
1Y
7.82%
3Y*
10.36%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QNZIX vs. QAMNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QNZIX has a 1.27% expense ratio, which is lower than QAMNX's 1.86% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

QNZIX vs. QAMNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QNZIX
QNZIX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
QNZIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QNZIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
QNZIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
QNZIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
QNZIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

QAMNX
QAMNX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
QAMNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QAMNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
QAMNX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
QAMNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
QAMNX Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QNZIX vs. QAMNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR Trend Total Return Fund Class I (QNZIX) and Federated Hermes MDT Market Neutral A (QAMNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QNZIXQAMNXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.06

1.23

+0.82

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.58

1.90

+0.67

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.27

+0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.79

1.97

+0.82

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.91

5.71

+8.20

QNZIX vs. QAMNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QNZIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is higher than the QAMNX Sharpe Ratio of 1.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QNZIX and QAMNX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QNZIXQAMNXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.06

1.23

+0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.81

0.87

+0.94

Correlation

The correlation between QNZIX and QAMNX is 0.19, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

QNZIX vs. QAMNX - Dividend Comparison

QNZIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, less than QAMNX's 1.51% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021
QNZIX
AQR Trend Total Return Fund Class I
1.00%1.07%16.81%23.32%2.14%0.00%
QAMNX
Federated Hermes MDT Market Neutral A
1.51%1.53%1.85%5.89%11.74%20.80%

Drawdowns

QNZIX vs. QAMNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QNZIX drawdown since its inception was -18.35%, roughly equal to the maximum QAMNX drawdown of -17.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QNZIX and QAMNX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


QNZIXQAMNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.35%

-17.97%

-0.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.27%

-4.16%

-6.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.11%

-0.42%

-1.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.87%

-5.25%

+2.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.07%

1.44%

+0.63%

Volatility

QNZIX vs. QAMNX - Volatility Comparison

AQR Trend Total Return Fund Class I (QNZIX) has a higher volatility of 2.71% compared to Federated Hermes MDT Market Neutral A (QAMNX) at 1.03%. This indicates that QNZIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QAMNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


QNZIXQAMNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.71%

1.03%

+1.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.92%

4.88%

+4.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.67%

6.38%

+7.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.19%

14.04%

-1.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.19%

14.04%

-1.85%