QNZIX vs. CEFS

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about AQR Trend Total Return Fund Class I (QNZIX) and Saba Closed-End Funds ETF (CEFS).

QNZIX is an actively managed fund by AQR Funds. It was launched on Dec 16, 2021. CEFS is an actively managed fund by Exchange Traded Concepts. It was launched on Mar 21, 2017.

Performance

QNZIX vs. CEFS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AQR Trend Total Return Fund Class I (QNZIX) and Saba Closed-End Funds ETF (CEFS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

QNZIX vs. CEFS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
QNZIX AQR Trend Total Return Fund Class I	5.97%	23.26%	35.22%	23.03%	1.57%
CEFS Saba Closed-End Funds ETF	-0.33%	16.67%	23.48%	20.99%	-3.20%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QNZIX achieves a 5.97% return, which is significantly higher than CEFS's -0.33% return.

QNZIX

• 1D: -0.58%
• 1M: -1.84%
• YTD: 5.97%
• 6M: 11.00%
• 1Y: 26.78%
• 3Y*: 27.97%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CEFS

• 1D: 2.04%
• 1M: -2.99%
• YTD: -0.33%
• 6M: 3.31%
• 1Y: 14.56%
• 3Y*: 17.06%
• 5Y*: 11.58%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QNZIX vs. CEFS - Expense Ratio Comparison

QNZIX has a 1.27% expense ratio, which is lower than CEFS's 3.80% expense ratio.

CEFS

Saba Closed-End Funds ETF

QNZIX

AQR Trend Total Return Fund Class I

Return for Risk

QNZIX vs. CEFS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QNZIX

QNZIX Risk / Return Rank: 92
QNZIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
QNZIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
QNZIX Omega Ratio Rank: 89
QNZIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
QNZIX Martin Ratio Rank: 95

CEFS

CEFS Risk / Return Rank: 66
CEFS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
CEFS Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
CEFS Omega Ratio Rank: 70
CEFS Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
CEFS Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QNZIX vs. CEFS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR Trend Total Return Fund Class I (QNZIX) and Saba Closed-End Funds ETF (CEFS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QNZIX	CEFS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.03	1.11	+0.92
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.55	1.54	+1.01
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.25	+0.14
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.57	1.43	+1.14
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	12.86	6.94	+5.91
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QNZIX vs. CEFS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QNZIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is higher than the CEFS Sharpe Ratio of 1.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QNZIX and CEFS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QNZIX	CEFS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.03	1.11	+0.92
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.90	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.79	0.70	+1.09

Correlation

The correlation between QNZIX and CEFS is 0.43, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

QNZIX vs. CEFS - Dividend Comparison

QNZIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, less than CEFS's 8.01% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
QNZIX AQR Trend Total Return Fund Class I	1.01%	1.07%	16.81%	23.32%	2.14%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
CEFS Saba Closed-End Funds ETF	8.01%	7.84%	8.79%	9.20%	11.32%	10.73%	8.61%	8.10%	10.43%	5.02%

Drawdowns

QNZIX vs. CEFS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QNZIX drawdown since its inception was -18.35%, smaller than the maximum CEFS drawdown of -38.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QNZIX and CEFS.

Drawdown Indicators

	QNZIX	CEFS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.35%	-38.99%	+20.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.34%	-9.80%	-0.54%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-16.85%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.02%	-3.75%	+0.73%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.87%	-3.73%	+0.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.07%	2.02%	+0.05%

Volatility

QNZIX vs. CEFS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AQR Trend Total Return Fund Class I (QNZIX) is 2.56%, while Saba Closed-End Funds ETF (CEFS) has a volatility of 4.75%. This indicates that QNZIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CEFS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QNZIX	CEFS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.56%	4.75%	-2.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.89%	7.46%	+1.43%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.67%	13.15%	+0.52%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.19%	12.99%	-0.80%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.19%	15.38%	-3.19%