QNXT vs. ROCQ
QNXT (iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF) and ROCQ (JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Yield ETF) are both Nasdaq-100 funds. QNXT is passively managed, while ROCQ is actively managed. Their 0.75 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. QNXT charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for ROCQ.
Performance
QNXT vs. ROCQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
QNXT
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- -1.03%
- 6M
- 10.78%
- YTD
- 12.29%
- 1Y
- 19.85%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 13.80%
ROCQ
- 1D
- 1.32%
- 1M
- -0.30%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $139.17K | $113.59K | $235.01K | |
| $13.13M | $10.74M | $11.66M |
QNXT vs. ROCQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
QNXT iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF | 15.28% |
ROCQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Yield ETF | 15.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between QNXT and ROCQ is 0.75, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2026 | 0.75 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QNXT vs. ROCQ — Risk / Return Rank
QNXT
ROCQ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
QNXT vs. ROCQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF (QNXT) and JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Yield ETF (ROCQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QNXT | ROCQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.96 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.94 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QNXT vs. ROCQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QNXT drawdown since its inception was -22.25%, which is greater than ROCQ's maximum drawdown of -8.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QNXT and ROCQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QNXT | ROCQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.25% | -8.05% | -14.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.16% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.51% | -3.02% | -0.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.75% | -1.58% | -2.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.35% | — | — |
Volatility
QNXT vs. ROCQ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QNXT | ROCQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.64% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.97% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.97% | 19.99% | -4.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.53% | 19.99% | -0.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.53% | 19.99% | -0.46% |
QNXT vs. ROCQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
QNXT has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than ROCQ's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
QNXT vs. ROCQ - Dividend Comparison
QNXT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, less than ROCQ's 4.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
QNXT iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF | 0.67% | 0.64% | 0.22% |
ROCQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Yield ETF | 4.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QNXT and ROCQ have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QNXT is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QNXT is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for ROCQ.
ROCQ has the higher dividend yield at 4.37%, compared with 0.67% for QNXT.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for QNXT and 0.35% for ROCQ.
Find the right allocation for QNXT and ROCQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer