QNXT vs. QNDX

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

QNXT (iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF) and QNDX (SPDR Portfolio Nasdaq 100 ETF) are both Nasdaq-100 funds - QNXT tracks the Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 UCITS Index while QNDX tracks the Nasdaq-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QNXT charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for QNDX.

Performance

QNXT vs. QNDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF (QNXT) and SPDR Portfolio Nasdaq 100 ETF (QNDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

QNXT

• 1D: -0.43%
• 1M: -1.35%
• 6M: 9.58%
• YTD: 11.75%
• 1Y: 15.91%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QNDX

• 1D: 1.12%
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QNXT vs. QNDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
QNXT iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF	-0.61%
QNDX SPDR Portfolio Nasdaq 100 ETF	0.74%

Correlation

The correlation between QNXT and QNDX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2026	0.84

Return for Risk

QNXT vs. QNDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QNXT

QNXT Risk / Return Rank: 35
QNXT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
QNXT Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
QNXT Omega Ratio Rank: 31
QNXT Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
QNXT Martin Ratio Rank: 39

QNDX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QNXT vs. QNDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF (QNXT) and SPDR Portfolio Nasdaq 100 ETF (QNDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QNXT	QNDX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.00	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.47	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.57	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.94	—	—

Drawdowns

QNXT vs. QNDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QNXT drawdown since its inception was -22.25%, which is greater than QNDX's maximum drawdown of -3.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QNXT and QNDX.

Drawdown Indicators

	QNXT	QNDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.25%	-3.65%	-18.60%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.16%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.98%	-2.25%	-1.73%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.71%	-1.71%	-2.00%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.23%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	QNXT	QNDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.72%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.03%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.91%	22.98%	-7.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.73%	22.98%	-3.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.73%	22.98%	-3.25%

QNXT vs. QNDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QNXT has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than QNDX's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

QNXT vs. QNDX - Dividend Comparison

QNXT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.68%, while QNDX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
QNDX SPDR Portfolio Nasdaq 100 ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QNXT iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF	0.68%	0.64%	0.22%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QNXT and QNDX in my portfolio?

QNXT and QNDX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, QNXT or QNDX?

On fees, QNDX is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, QNXT or QNDX?

QNDX is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for QNXT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QNXT or QNDX?

QNXT has the higher dividend yield at 0.68%, compared with 0.00% for QNDX.

What is the main difference between QNXT and QNDX?

QNXT tracks Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 UCITS Index, while QNDX tracks Nasdaq-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for QNXT and 0.10% for QNDX.