PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QNTM vs. SPY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QNTM vs. SPY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Quantum BioPharma Ltd (QNTM) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QNTM achieves a -33.15% return, which is significantly lower than SPY's 10.91% return.


QNTM

1D
-4.50%
1M
-6.15%
YTD
-33.15%
6M
-51.15%
1Y
-68.42%
3Y*
-60.52%
5Y*
-47.60%
10Y*

SPY

1D
-0.70%
1M
5.05%
YTD
10.91%
6M
10.91%
1Y
27.98%
3Y*
22.35%
5Y*
13.83%
10Y*
15.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QNTM vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
QNTM
Quantum BioPharma Ltd
-33.15%98.37%-93.84%16.67%-22.71%-34.62%-71.27%-87.38%148.84%
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
10.91%17.72%24.89%26.18%-18.18%28.73%18.33%31.22%-8.82%

Correlation

The correlation between QNTM and SPY is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 11, 2018

0.19

The correlation between QNTM and SPY shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (1 year) to 0.19 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QNTM vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QNTM
QNTM Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
QNTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QNTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
QNTM Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
QNTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
QNTM Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

SPY
SPY Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
SPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPY Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
SPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPY Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QNTM vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Quantum BioPharma Ltd (QNTM) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QNTMSPYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.43

2.38

-2.81

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.05

3.24

-3.19

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.43

-0.43

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.73

3.16

-3.89

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.98

14.72

-15.70

QNTM vs. SPY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QNTM Sharpe Ratio is -0.43, which is lower than the SPY Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QNTM and SPY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QNTMSPYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.43

2.38

-2.81

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.36

0.82

-1.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.35

0.59

-0.94

Drawdowns

QNTM vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QNTM drawdown since its inception was -99.98%, which is greater than SPY's maximum drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QNTM and SPY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QNTMSPYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.98%

-55.19%

-44.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-94.00%

-8.88%

-85.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-97.98%

-18.76%

-79.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-98.42%

-24.50%

-73.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.95%

-0.70%

-99.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-92.23%

-9.05%

-83.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

69.94%

1.91%

+68.03%

Volatility

QNTM vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison

Quantum BioPharma Ltd (QNTM) has a higher volatility of 54.41% compared to State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) at 2.84%. This indicates that QNTM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QNTMSPYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

54.41%

2.84%

+51.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

112.88%

8.90%

+103.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

159.83%

11.83%

+148.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

134.07%

17.05%

+117.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

140.70%

17.94%

+122.76%

Dividends

QNTM vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison

QNTM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QNTM
Quantum BioPharma Ltd
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
0.98%1.07%1.21%1.40%1.65%1.20%1.52%1.75%2.04%1.80%2.03%2.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


QNTM and SPY have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QNTM has higher volatility (54.41%) compared to SPY (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QNTM dropped -99.98% vs SPY's -55.19%.

SPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs -0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QNTM and SPY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer