PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QNTM vs. QMOM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QNTM vs. QMOM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Quantum BioPharma Ltd (QNTM) and Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF (QMOM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QNTM achieves a -60.41% return, which is significantly lower than QMOM's 12.94% return.


QNTM

1D
1.76%
1M
-17.66%
6M
-36.90%
YTD
-60.41%
1Y
-87.81%
3Y*
-67.70%
5Y*
-52.03%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-51.98%

QMOM

1D
-0.42%
1M
-2.80%
6M
8.63%
YTD
12.94%
1Y
17.87%
3Y*
17.31%
5Y*
9.60%
10Y*
12.30%
ALL TIME*
12.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.43M$1.49M$2.25M
$262.51K$263.06K$1.42M

QNTM vs. QMOM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
QNTM
Quantum BioPharma Ltd
-60.41%98.37%-93.84%16.67%-22.71%-34.62%-71.27%-87.38%145.98%
QMOM
Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF
12.94%2.36%30.43%9.50%-6.99%-4.06%61.94%28.39%-21.16%

Correlation

The correlation between QNTM and QMOM is 0.08, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 8, 2018

0.22

The correlation between QNTM and QMOM shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (1 year) to 0.22 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QNTM vs. QMOM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QNTM
QNTM Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
QNTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QNTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
QNTM Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
QNTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
QNTM Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

QMOM
QMOM Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
QMOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QMOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
QMOM Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
QMOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
QMOM Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QNTM vs. QMOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Quantum BioPharma Ltd (QNTM) and Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF (QMOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QNTMQMOMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.87

1.13

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.95

1.27

-2.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.19

3.80

-4.99

QNTM vs. QMOM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QNTM Sharpe Ratio is -0.60, which is lower than the QMOM Sharpe Ratio of 0.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QNTM and QMOM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QNTM vs. QMOM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QNTM drawdown since its inception was -99.98%, which is greater than QMOM's maximum drawdown of -39.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QNTM and QMOM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QNTMQMOMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.98%

-39.13%

-60.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-92.81%

-12.76%

-80.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-97.98%

-26.46%

-71.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-98.42%

-26.82%

-71.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.97%

-9.73%

-90.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-92.34%

-12.83%

-79.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

73.68%

4.26%

+69.42%

Volatility

QNTM vs. QMOM - Volatility Comparison

Quantum BioPharma Ltd (QNTM) has a higher volatility of 16.50% compared to Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF (QMOM) at 7.59%. This indicates that QNTM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QMOM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QNTMQMOMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.50%

7.59%

+8.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

106.32%

22.16%

+84.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

146.13%

25.74%

+120.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

134.30%

24.46%

+109.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

139.57%

26.72%

+112.85%

Dividends

QNTM vs. QMOM - Dividend Comparison

QNTM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QMOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.48%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
QMOM
Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF
0.48%0.54%1.40%0.87%1.59%0.12%0.08%0.01%0.05%0.13%0.34%
QNTM
Quantum BioPharma Ltd
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QNTM and QMOM have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QNTM has higher volatility (16.50%) compared to QMOM (7.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QNTM dropped -99.98% vs QMOM's -39.13%.

QMOM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.63 vs -0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QNTM and QMOM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer