QNDX vs. XLU
QNDX (SPDR Portfolio Nasdaq 100 ETF) and XLU (State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QNDX is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq-100 Index, while XLU is a Utilities Equities fund tracking the Utilities Select Sector Index. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.60, they often move in opposite directions. QNDX charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLU.
Performance
QNDX vs. XLU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
QNDX
- 1D
- 1.12%
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLU
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 3.26%
- 6M
- 8.06%
- YTD
- 8.46%
- 1Y
- 13.47%
- 3Y*
- 14.37%
- 5Y*
- 10.11%
- 10Y*
- 9.20%
QNDX vs. XLU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
QNDX SPDR Portfolio Nasdaq 100 ETF | 0.74% |
XLU State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF | 1.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between QNDX and XLU is -0.60, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2026 | -0.60 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QNDX vs. XLU — Risk / Return Rank
QNDX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
XLU
QNDX vs. XLU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio Nasdaq 100 ETF (QNDX) and State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QNDX | XLU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.16 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.47 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 3.07 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QNDX vs. XLU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QNDX drawdown since its inception was -3.65%, smaller than the maximum XLU drawdown of -51.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QNDX and XLU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QNDX | XLU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.65% | -51.98% | +48.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.18% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -17.26% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.26% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.25% | -2.99% | +0.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.71% | -10.20% | +8.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.39% | — |
Volatility
QNDX vs. XLU - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QNDX | XLU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.41% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.75% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.98% | 14.89% | +8.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.98% | 17.34% | +5.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.98% | 19.29% | +3.69% |
QNDX vs. XLU - Expense Ratio Comparison
QNDX has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than XLU's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
QNDX vs. XLU - Dividend Comparison
QNDX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XLU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.62%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QNDX SPDR Portfolio Nasdaq 100 ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLU State Street Utilities Select Sector SPDR ETF | 2.62% | 2.71% | 2.96% | 3.39% | 2.92% | 2.79% | 3.14% | 2.95% | 3.33% | 3.33% | 3.41% | 3.67% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QNDX and XLU have a correlation of -0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLU is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLU is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for QNDX.
XLU has the higher dividend yield at 2.62%, compared with 0.00% for QNDX.
QNDX is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while XLU is Utilities Equities. QNDX tracks Nasdaq-100 Index, while XLU tracks Utilities Select Sector Index. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for QNDX and 0.08% for XLU.
Find the right allocation for QNDX and XLU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer