QNDX vs. QYLG

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

QNDX (SPDR Portfolio Nasdaq 100 ETF) and QYLG (Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF) are both Nasdaq-100 funds - QNDX tracks the Nasdaq-100 Index while QYLG tracks the CBOE Nasdaq-100 BuyWrite V2 Index. Both are passively managed. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. QNDX charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for QYLG.

Performance

QNDX vs. QYLG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Portfolio Nasdaq 100 ETF (QNDX) and Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF (QYLG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

QNDX

• 1D: -1.56%
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QYLG

• 1D: -1.62%
• 1M: -1.59%
• 6M: 10.67%
• YTD: 11.95%
• 1Y: 24.48%
• 3Y*: 18.25%
• 5Y*: 11.80%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QNDX vs. QYLG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
QNDX SPDR Portfolio Nasdaq 100 ETF	-1.16%
QYLG Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF	-0.38%

Correlation

The correlation between QNDX and QYLG is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2026	0.98

Return for Risk

QNDX vs. QYLG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QNDX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

QYLG

QYLG Risk / Return Rank: 69
QYLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
QYLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
QYLG Omega Ratio Rank: 63
QYLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
QYLG Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QNDX vs. QYLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio Nasdaq 100 ETF (QNDX) and Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF (QYLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QNDX	QYLG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.71	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.35	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.31	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.92	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	12.24	—

Drawdowns

QNDX vs. QYLG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QNDX drawdown since its inception was -4.09%, smaller than the maximum QYLG drawdown of -29.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QNDX and QYLG.

Drawdown Indicators

	QNDX	QYLG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.09%	-29.98%	+25.89%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-8.42%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-20.75%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-29.98%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.09%	-3.31%	-0.78%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.91%	-6.33%	+4.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.00%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	QNDX	QYLG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	6.28%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	12.34%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.37%	14.40%	+7.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.37%	18.31%	+4.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.37%	18.06%	+4.31%

QNDX vs. QYLG - Expense Ratio Comparison

QNDX has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than QYLG's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

QNDX vs. QYLG - Dividend Comparison

QNDX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QYLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.75%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
QNDX SPDR Portfolio Nasdaq 100 ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QYLG Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF	16.75%	17.93%	25.27%	5.43%	6.91%	10.15%	1.44%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QNDX and QYLG in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.98, QNDX and QYLG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, QNDX or QYLG?

On fees, QNDX is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, QNDX or QYLG?

QNDX is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QYLG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QNDX or QYLG?

QYLG has the higher dividend yield at 16.75%, compared with 0.00% for QNDX.

What is the main difference between QNDX and QYLG?

QNDX tracks Nasdaq-100 Index, while QYLG tracks CBOE Nasdaq-100 BuyWrite V2 Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for QNDX and 0.60% for QYLG.