QNDX vs. QQQG

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

QNDX (SPDR Portfolio Nasdaq 100 ETF) and QQQG (Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF) are both Nasdaq-100 funds. QNDX is passively managed, while QQQG is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QNDX charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for QQQG.

Performance

QNDX vs. QQQG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Portfolio Nasdaq 100 ETF (QNDX) and Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (QQQG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

QNDX

• 1D: 1.12%
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QQQG

• 1D: 1.53%
• 1M: 0.43%
• 6M: 27.23%
• YTD: 30.77%
• 1Y: 38.73%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QNDX vs. QQQG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
QNDX SPDR Portfolio Nasdaq 100 ETF	0.74%
QQQG Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF	-0.18%

Correlation

The correlation between QNDX and QQQG is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2026	0.86

Return for Risk

QNDX vs. QQQG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QNDX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

QQQG

QQQG Risk / Return Rank: 63
QQQG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
QQQG Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
QQQG Omega Ratio Rank: 59
QQQG Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
QQQG Martin Ratio Rank: 67

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QNDX vs. QQQG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Portfolio Nasdaq 100 ETF (QNDX) and Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (QQQG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QNDX	QQQG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.66	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.20	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.29	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.82	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	9.57	—

Drawdowns

QNDX vs. QQQG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QNDX drawdown since its inception was -3.65%, smaller than the maximum QQQG drawdown of -23.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QNDX and QQQG.

Drawdown Indicators

	QNDX	QQQG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.65%	-23.61%	+19.96%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-13.79%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.25%	-4.46%	+2.21%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.71%	-3.59%	+1.88%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	4.06%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	QNDX	QQQG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	11.57%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	20.48%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.98%	23.49%	-0.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.98%	24.83%	-1.85%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.98%	24.83%	-1.85%

QNDX vs. QQQG - Expense Ratio Comparison

QNDX has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQG's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

QNDX vs. QQQG - Dividend Comparison

QNDX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
QNDX SPDR Portfolio Nasdaq 100 ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QQQG Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF	0.05%	0.06%	0.11%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QNDX and QQQG in my portfolio?

QNDX and QQQG have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, QNDX or QQQG?

On fees, QNDX is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, QNDX or QQQG?

QNDX is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for QQQG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QNDX or QQQG?

QQQG has the higher dividend yield at 0.05%, compared with 0.00% for QNDX.

What is the main difference between QNDX and QQQG?

They also come from different issuers: State Street and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for QNDX and 0.49% for QQQG.