PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QMOM vs. QNTM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QMOM vs. QNTM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF (QMOM) and Quantum BioPharma Ltd (QNTM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QMOM achieves a 19.77% return, which is significantly higher than QNTM's -47.26% return.


QMOM

1D
-2.68%
1M
0.91%
YTD
19.77%
6M
17.29%
1Y
23.83%
3Y*
21.42%
5Y*
10.17%
10Y*
13.57%

QNTM

1D
5.19%
1M
-58.33%
YTD
-47.26%
6M
-59.30%
1Y
-83.27%
3Y*
-64.46%
5Y*
-49.48%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QMOM vs. QNTM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
QMOM
Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF
19.77%2.36%30.43%9.50%-6.99%-4.06%61.94%28.39%-21.16%
QNTM
Quantum BioPharma Ltd
-47.26%98.37%-93.84%16.67%-22.71%-34.62%-71.27%-87.38%145.98%

Correlation

The correlation between QMOM and QNTM is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 8, 2018

0.22

The correlation between QMOM and QNTM shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (1 year) to 0.22 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QMOM vs. QNTM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QMOM
QMOM Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
QMOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QMOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
QMOM Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
QMOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
QMOM Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

QNTM
QNTM Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
QNTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QNTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
QNTM Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
QNTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
QNTM Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QMOM vs. QNTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF (QMOM) and Quantum BioPharma Ltd (QNTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QMOMQNTMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

0.91

+0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.89

-0.90

+2.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.64

-1.22

+7.86

QMOM vs. QNTM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QMOM Sharpe Ratio is 0.97, which is higher than the QNTM Sharpe Ratio of -0.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QMOM and QNTM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QMOM vs. QNTM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QMOM drawdown since its inception was -39.13%, smaller than the maximum QNTM drawdown of -99.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QMOM and QNTM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QMOMQNTMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.13%

-99.98%

+60.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.65%

-92.81%

+80.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.46%

-97.98%

+71.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.82%

-98.42%

+71.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.27%

-99.96%

+95.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.89%

-92.23%

+79.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.60%

68.15%

-64.55%

Volatility

QMOM vs. QNTM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF (QMOM) is 9.55%, while Quantum BioPharma Ltd (QNTM) has a volatility of 45.52%. This indicates that QMOM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QNTM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QMOMQNTMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.55%

45.52%

-35.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.17%

110.50%

-89.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.71%

154.68%

-129.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.42%

134.20%

-109.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.62%

140.35%

-113.73%

Dividends

QMOM vs. QNTM - Dividend Comparison

QMOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%, while QNTM has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
QMOM
Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF
0.45%0.54%1.40%0.87%1.59%0.12%0.08%0.01%0.05%0.13%0.34%
QNTM
Quantum BioPharma Ltd
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QMOM and QNTM have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QNTM has higher volatility (45.52%) compared to QMOM (9.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QMOM dropped -39.13% vs QNTM's -99.98%.

QMOM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.97 vs -0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QMOM and QNTM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer