QMOM vs. PRN

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

QMOM (Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF) and PRN (Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF) are both Momentum funds. QMOM is actively managed, while PRN is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, QMOM returned 13.82%/yr vs 18.51%/yr for PRN. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QMOM charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for PRN.

Performance

QMOM vs. PRN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF (QMOM) and Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF (PRN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QMOM achieves a 24.65% return, which is significantly lower than PRN's 41.80% return. Over the past 10 years, QMOM has underperformed PRN with an annualized return of 13.82%, while PRN has yielded a comparatively higher 18.51% annualized return.

QMOM

• 1D: -0.37%
• 1M: 6.10%
• YTD: 24.65%
• 6M: 26.71%
• 1Y: 31.51%
• 3Y*: 23.22%
• 5Y*: 11.55%
• 10Y*: 13.82%

PRN

• 1D: 0.59%
• 1M: 6.86%
• YTD: 41.80%
• 6M: 45.38%
• 1Y: 65.12%
• 3Y*: 36.96%
• 5Y*: 20.18%
• 10Y*: 18.51%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QMOM vs. PRN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
QMOM Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF	24.65%	2.36%	30.43%	9.50%	-6.99%	-4.06%	61.94%	28.39%	-11.75%	15.92%
PRN Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF	41.80%	13.74%	30.35%	37.96%	-25.09%	25.21%	36.39%	34.52%	-16.19%	22.82%

Correlation

The correlation between QMOM and PRN is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.88
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.86
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.83
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.76
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016	0.75

The correlation between QMOM and PRN shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (all time) to 0.88 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

QMOM vs. PRN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QMOM	PRN
Industrials	37.5%	79.3%
Technology	23.9%	19.4%
Basic Materials	9.0%	1.8%
Healthcare	8.9%	-
Consumer Cyclical	7.4%	1.2%
Energy	5.5%	1.6%
Communication Services	4.2%	-
Utilities	2.0%	-
Financial Services	1.9%	0.1%
Consumer Defensive	1.6%	-
Real Estate	-	-

Return for Risk

QMOM vs. PRN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QMOM

QMOM Risk / Return Rank: 42
QMOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
QMOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
QMOM Omega Ratio Rank: 37
QMOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
QMOM Martin Ratio Rank: 53

PRN

PRN Risk / Return Rank: 70
PRN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
PRN Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
PRN Omega Ratio Rank: 60
PRN Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
PRN Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QMOM vs. PRN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF (QMOM) and Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF (PRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QMOM	PRN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.36	2.29	-0.93
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.91	2.86	-0.95
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.37	-0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.50	4.63	-2.12
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.15	15.45	-6.30
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QMOM vs. PRN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QMOM Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is lower than the PRN Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QMOM and PRN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QMOM	PRN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.36	2.29	-0.93
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.48	0.81	-0.33
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.52	0.77	-0.24
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.52	0.52	-0.01

Drawdowns

QMOM vs. PRN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QMOM drawdown since its inception was -39.13%, smaller than the maximum PRN drawdown of -59.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QMOM and PRN.

Drawdown Indicators

	QMOM	PRN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.13%	-59.88%	+20.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.65%	-14.15%	+1.50%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.46%	-30.78%	+4.32%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.82%	-34.84%	+8.02%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.13%	-36.27%	-2.86%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.37%	-0.47%	+0.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.92%	-10.84%	-2.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.45%	4.23%	-0.78%

Volatility

QMOM vs. PRN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF (QMOM) is 8.32%, while Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF (PRN) has a volatility of 10.95%. This indicates that QMOM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QMOM	PRN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.32%	10.95%	-2.63%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.78%	23.22%	-3.44%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.30%	28.66%	-5.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.19%	25.03%	-0.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.49%	24.17%	+2.32%

QMOM vs. PRN - Expense Ratio Comparison

QMOM has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than PRN's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

QMOM vs. PRN - Dividend Comparison

QMOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%, more than PRN's 0.11% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PRN Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF	0.11%	0.17%	0.39%	0.52%	0.82%	0.11%	0.10%	0.42%	0.29%	0.60%	0.57%	0.44%
QMOM Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF	0.44%	0.54%	1.40%	0.87%	1.59%	0.12%	0.08%	0.01%	0.05%	0.13%	0.34%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QMOM and PRN in my portfolio?

QMOM and PRN have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QMOM or PRN?

PRN has higher volatility (10.95%) compared to QMOM (8.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QMOM dropped -39.13% vs PRN's -59.88%.

Which ETF is better, QMOM or PRN?

On 10-year performance, PRN leads with 18.51% vs 13.82% for QMOM. On fees, QMOM is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, QMOM has been the lower-risk option at 8.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QMOM or PRN?

Over the 10-year period, PRN has performed better with a 18.51% return vs 13.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QMOM or PRN?

QMOM is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PRN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QMOM or PRN?

QMOM has the higher dividend yield at 0.44%, compared with 0.11% for PRN.

What is the main difference between QMOM and PRN?

They also come from different issuers: Alpha Architect and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for QMOM and 0.60% for PRN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PRN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.