PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QMNNX vs. JRTMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QMNNX vs. JRTMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AQR Equity Market Neutral Fund N (QMNNX) and John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2035 Lifetime Portfolio (JRTMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QMNNX achieves a -5.98% return, which is significantly lower than JRTMX's 9.32% return.


QMNNX

1D
0.00%
1M
1.33%
YTD
-5.98%
6M
-3.37%
1Y
3.79%
3Y*
19.60%
5Y*
16.89%
10Y*
6.01%

JRTMX

1D
-0.56%
1M
2.68%
YTD
9.32%
6M
9.75%
1Y
21.66%
3Y*
15.31%
5Y*
7.09%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QMNNX vs. JRTMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
QMNNX
AQR Equity Market Neutral Fund N
-5.98%26.19%25.43%16.30%27.07%17.38%-19.79%-3.33%
JRTMX
John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2035 Lifetime Portfolio
9.32%16.54%11.04%15.26%-17.97%15.75%15.08%10.57%

Correlation

The correlation between QMNNX and JRTMX is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 28, 2019

-0.14

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QMNNX vs. JRTMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QMNNX
QMNNX Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
QMNNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QMNNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
QMNNX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
QMNNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
QMNNX Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

JRTMX
JRTMX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
JRTMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JRTMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
JRTMX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
JRTMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
JRTMX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QMNNX vs. JRTMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR Equity Market Neutral Fund N (QMNNX) and John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2035 Lifetime Portfolio (JRTMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QMNNXJRTMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.44

-0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.40

3.12

-2.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.92

13.68

-12.76

QMNNX vs. JRTMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QMNNX Sharpe Ratio is 0.50, which is lower than the JRTMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QMNNX and JRTMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QMNNXJRTMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

2.38

-1.88

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.81

0.57

+1.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.83

0.69

+0.14

Drawdowns

QMNNX vs. JRTMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QMNNX drawdown since its inception was -39.22%, which is greater than JRTMX's maximum drawdown of -29.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QMNNX and JRTMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QMNNXJRTMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.22%

-29.63%

-9.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.41%

-7.06%

-1.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.41%

-12.18%

+3.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.98%

-24.97%

+10.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.37%

-0.56%

-5.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.61%

-5.63%

-4.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.63%

1.61%

+2.02%

Volatility

QMNNX vs. JRTMX - Volatility Comparison

AQR Equity Market Neutral Fund N (QMNNX) and John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2035 Lifetime Portfolio (JRTMX) have volatilities of 2.81% and 2.95%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QMNNXJRTMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.81%

2.95%

-0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.24%

7.40%

-2.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.72%

9.25%

-2.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.40%

12.55%

-3.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.30%

15.44%

-7.14%

QMNNX vs. JRTMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QMNNX has a 5.28% expense ratio, which is higher than JRTMX's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

QMNNX vs. JRTMX - Dividend Comparison

QMNNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%, less than JRTMX's 2.31% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JRTMX
John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2035 Lifetime Portfolio
2.31%2.52%2.12%2.26%7.16%5.67%4.72%8.45%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QMNNX
AQR Equity Market Neutral Fund N
1.34%1.26%6.06%21.67%5.77%1.41%17.64%3.86%0.49%3.37%1.19%2.51%

Frequently Asked Questions


QMNNX and JRTMX have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JRTMX has higher volatility (2.95%) compared to QMNNX (2.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QMNNX dropped -39.22% vs JRTMX's -29.63%.

JRTMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QMNNX and JRTMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer