PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QMNNX vs. BPLEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QMNNX vs. BPLEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AQR Equity Market Neutral Fund N (QMNNX) and Boston Partners Long/Short Equity Fund (BPLEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QMNNX achieves a -5.98% return, which is significantly lower than BPLEX's 11.29% return. Over the past 10 years, QMNNX has underperformed BPLEX with an annualized return of 6.01%, while BPLEX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.44% annualized return.


QMNNX

1D
-0.78%
1M
1.06%
YTD
-5.98%
6M
-3.13%
1Y
3.33%
3Y*
19.60%
5Y*
16.89%
10Y*
6.01%

BPLEX

1D
-0.26%
1M
2.36%
YTD
11.29%
6M
14.22%
1Y
33.42%
3Y*
36.58%
5Y*
23.92%
10Y*
13.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QMNNX vs. BPLEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QMNNX
AQR Equity Market Neutral Fund N
-5.98%26.19%25.43%16.30%27.07%17.38%-19.79%-11.55%-11.94%5.56%
BPLEX
Boston Partners Long/Short Equity Fund
11.29%27.87%56.97%14.93%6.95%31.73%-5.82%8.97%-15.70%2.54%

Correlation

The correlation between QMNNX and BPLEX is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2015

0.13

The correlation between QMNNX and BPLEX shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (1 year) to 0.19 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QMNNX vs. BPLEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QMNNX
QMNNX Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
QMNNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QMNNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
QMNNX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
QMNNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
QMNNX Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

BPLEX
BPLEX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
BPLEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BPLEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
BPLEX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
BPLEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
BPLEX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QMNNX vs. BPLEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR Equity Market Neutral Fund N (QMNNX) and Boston Partners Long/Short Equity Fund (BPLEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QMNNXBPLEXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.60

-0.51

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.40

6.47

-6.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.93

23.28

-22.36

QMNNX vs. BPLEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QMNNX Sharpe Ratio is 0.50, which is lower than the BPLEX Sharpe Ratio of 3.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QMNNX and BPLEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QMNNXBPLEXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

3.23

-2.74

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.81

0.63

+1.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

0.46

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.83

0.55

+0.28

Drawdowns

QMNNX vs. BPLEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QMNNX drawdown since its inception was -39.22%, smaller than the maximum BPLEX drawdown of -43.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QMNNX and BPLEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QMNNXBPLEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.22%

-43.47%

+4.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.41%

-5.23%

-3.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.41%

-28.78%

+20.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.98%

-28.78%

+14.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.22%

-37.65%

-1.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.37%

-0.26%

-6.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.61%

-6.62%

-3.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.61%

1.45%

+2.16%

Volatility

QMNNX vs. BPLEX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AQR Equity Market Neutral Fund N (QMNNX) is 2.81%, while Boston Partners Long/Short Equity Fund (BPLEX) has a volatility of 4.05%. This indicates that QMNNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BPLEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QMNNXBPLEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.81%

4.05%

-1.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.26%

8.24%

-2.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.74%

10.47%

-3.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.40%

37.92%

-28.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.30%

29.30%

-21.00%

QMNNX vs. BPLEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QMNNX has a 5.28% expense ratio, which is higher than BPLEX's 2.21% expense ratio.


Dividends

QMNNX vs. BPLEX - Dividend Comparison

QMNNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%, less than BPLEX's 9.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BPLEX
Boston Partners Long/Short Equity Fund
9.83%10.94%58.72%28.35%15.19%5.11%44.84%11.33%9.69%0.83%0.00%9.91%
QMNNX
AQR Equity Market Neutral Fund N
1.34%1.26%6.06%21.67%5.77%1.41%17.64%3.86%0.49%3.37%1.19%2.51%

Frequently Asked Questions


QMNNX and BPLEX have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BPLEX has higher volatility (4.05%) compared to QMNNX (2.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QMNNX dropped -39.22% vs BPLEX's -43.47%.

BPLEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.23 vs 0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QMNNX and BPLEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer