PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QMNNX vs. BDMIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QMNNX vs. BDMIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AQR Equity Market Neutral Fund Class N (QMNNX) and BlackRock Global Equity Market Neutral Fund Class I (BDMIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QMNNX achieves a -5.90% return, which is significantly lower than BDMIX's 12.78% return. Over the past 10 years, QMNNX has underperformed BDMIX with an annualized return of 6.00%, while BDMIX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.60% annualized return.


QMNNX

1D
0.09%
1M
4.08%
6M
-2.79%
YTD
-5.90%
1Y
4.82%
3Y*
16.77%
5Y*
18.46%
10Y*
6.00%
ALL TIME*
6.67%

BDMIX

1D
-0.13%
1M
2.32%
6M
10.88%
YTD
12.78%
1Y
23.31%
3Y*
21.04%
5Y*
13.23%
10Y*
8.60%
ALL TIME*
6.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

QMNNX vs. BDMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QMNNX
AQR Equity Market Neutral Fund Class N
-5.90%26.19%25.43%16.30%27.07%17.38%-19.79%-11.55%-11.94%5.56%
BDMIX
BlackRock Global Equity Market Neutral Fund Class I
12.78%18.30%21.39%14.55%1.80%3.34%0.29%-0.85%2.20%12.85%

Correlation

The correlation between QMNNX and BDMIX is 0.45, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.28

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2015

0.27

The correlation between QMNNX and BDMIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (all time) to 0.45 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QMNNX vs. BDMIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QMNNX
QMNNX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
QMNNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QMNNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
QMNNX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
QMNNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
QMNNX Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

BDMIX
BDMIX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
BDMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BDMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
BDMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
BDMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
BDMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QMNNX vs. BDMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR Equity Market Neutral Fund Class N (QMNNX) and BlackRock Global Equity Market Neutral Fund Class I (BDMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QMNNXBDMIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.62

-0.48

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.56

7.55

-6.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.17

20.05

-18.88

QMNNX vs. BDMIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QMNNX Sharpe Ratio is 0.80, which is lower than the BDMIX Sharpe Ratio of 3.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QMNNX and BDMIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QMNNX vs. BDMIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QMNNX drawdown since its inception was -39.22%, which is greater than BDMIX's maximum drawdown of -11.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QMNNX and BDMIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QMNNXBDMIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.22%

-11.89%

-27.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.96%

-3.24%

-6.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.96%

-4.07%

-5.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.98%

-4.91%

-9.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.22%

-9.44%

-29.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.29%

-0.41%

-5.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.57%

-2.66%

-7.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.79%

1.22%

+3.57%

Volatility

QMNNX vs. BDMIX - Volatility Comparison

AQR Equity Market Neutral Fund Class N (QMNNX) and BlackRock Global Equity Market Neutral Fund Class I (BDMIX) have volatilities of 2.50% and 2.53%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QMNNXBDMIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.50%

2.53%

-0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.65%

5.41%

+0.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.00%

7.44%

-0.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.30%

6.69%

+2.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.35%

5.91%

+2.44%

QMNNX vs. BDMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QMNNX has a 1.62% expense ratio, which is higher than BDMIX's 1.34% expense ratio.


Dividends

QMNNX vs. BDMIX - Dividend Comparison

QMNNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.33%, less than BDMIX's 11.48% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BDMIX
BlackRock Global Equity Market Neutral Fund Class I
11.48%8.94%13.26%7.42%0.00%1.23%0.30%6.78%0.94%0.00%0.00%1.86%
QMNNX
AQR Equity Market Neutral Fund Class N
1.33%1.26%6.06%21.67%5.77%1.41%17.64%3.86%0.49%3.37%1.19%2.51%

Frequently Asked Questions


QMNNX and BDMIX have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BDMIX has higher volatility (2.53%) compared to QMNNX (2.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QMNNX dropped -39.22% vs BDMIX's -11.89%.

BDMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.30 vs 0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QMNNX and BDMIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer