QMID vs. FCUS

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Fund (QMID) and Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF (FCUS).

QMID and FCUS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. QMID is a passively managed fund by WisdomTree that tracks the performance of the WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Index. It was launched on Jan 25, 2024. FCUS is an actively managed fund by Pinnacle. It was launched on Dec 28, 2022.

Performance

QMID vs. FCUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Fund (QMID) and Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF (FCUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

QMID vs. FCUS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
QMID WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Fund	-4.14%	5.02%	9.33%
FCUS Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF	14.56%	13.69%	28.53%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QMID achieves a -4.14% return, which is significantly lower than FCUS's 14.56% return.

QMID

• 1D: 2.88%
• 1M: -7.04%
• YTD: -4.14%
• 6M: -3.82%
• 1Y: 7.43%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FCUS

• 1D: 5.33%
• 1M: -8.18%
• YTD: 14.56%
• 6M: 17.93%
• 1Y: 63.71%
• 3Y*: 24.55%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QMID vs. FCUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

QMID has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than FCUS's 0.79% expense ratio.

FCUS

Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF

QMID

WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Fund

Return for Risk

QMID vs. FCUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QMID

QMID Risk / Return Rank: 24
QMID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
QMID Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
QMID Omega Ratio Rank: 22
QMID Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
QMID Martin Ratio Rank: 28

FCUS

FCUS Risk / Return Rank: 87
FCUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
FCUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
FCUS Omega Ratio Rank: 82
FCUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
FCUS Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QMID vs. FCUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Fund (QMID) and Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF (FCUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QMID	FCUS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.36	1.84	-1.48
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.68	2.22	-1.54
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	1.32	-0.23
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.60	3.51	-2.91
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.40	11.65	-9.26
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QMID vs. FCUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QMID Sharpe Ratio is 0.36, which is lower than the FCUS Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QMID and FCUS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QMID	FCUS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.36	1.84	-1.48
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.24	0.84	-0.60

Correlation

The correlation between QMID and FCUS is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

QMID vs. FCUS - Dividend Comparison

QMID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, less than FCUS's 3.78% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024
QMID WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Fund	0.54%	0.51%	1.16%
FCUS Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF	3.78%	4.33%	11.19%

Drawdowns

QMID vs. FCUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QMID drawdown since its inception was -24.42%, smaller than the maximum FCUS drawdown of -39.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QMID and FCUS.

Drawdown Indicators

	QMID	FCUS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.42%	-39.89%	+15.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.65%	-17.70%	+4.05%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.10%	-9.72%	+1.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.63%	-7.83%	+2.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.44%	5.34%	-1.90%

Volatility

QMID vs. FCUS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Fund (QMID) is 5.46%, while Pinnacle Focused Opportunities ETF (FCUS) has a volatility of 16.58%. This indicates that QMID experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QMID	FCUS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.46%	16.58%	-11.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.45%	29.46%	-18.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.55%	34.85%	-14.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.84%	30.06%	-11.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.84%	30.06%	-11.22%