QMID vs. DGRS
QMID (WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Fund) and DGRS (WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Fund) are both Quality Factor funds from WisdomTree - QMID tracks the WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Index while DGRS tracks the WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, QMID returned 10.41% vs 31.79% for DGRS. Their correlation of 0.83 means they have usually moved in the same direction. Both charge a 0.38% expense ratio.
Performance
QMID vs. DGRS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QMID achieves a 5.39% return, which is significantly lower than DGRS's 21.67% return.
QMID
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- 0.96%
- 6M
- 4.68%
- YTD
- 5.39%
- 1Y
- 10.41%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 7.76%
DGRS
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- 1.90%
- 6M
- 12.89%
- YTD
- 21.67%
- 1Y
- 31.79%
- 3Y*
- 12.75%
- 5Y*
- 8.44%
- 10Y*
- 9.82%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.54%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $2.61M | $2.32M | $1.84M | |
| $4.39K | $13.06K | $31.63K |
QMID vs. DGRS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
QMID WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Fund | 5.39% | 5.02% | 9.01% |
DGRS WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Fund | 21.67% | -0.43% | 13.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between QMID and DGRS is 0.77, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 2024 | 0.83 |
The correlation between QMID and DGRS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
QMID vs. DGRS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QMID
DGRS
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Industrials
QMID
DGRS
Consumer Cyclical
QMID
DGRS
Healthcare
QMID
DGRS
Technology
QMID
DGRS
Financial Services
QMID
DGRS
Communication Services
QMID
DGRS
Consumer Defensive
QMID
DGRS
Energy
QMID
DGRS
Basic Materials
QMID
DGRS
Real Estate
QMID
-
DGRS
Utilities
QMID
-
DGRS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QMID vs. DGRS — Risk / Return Rank
QMID
DGRS
QMID vs. DGRS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Fund (QMID) and WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QMID | DGRS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.30 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.82 | 2.98 | -2.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.77 | 9.53 | -6.76 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QMID vs. DGRS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QMID drawdown since its inception was -24.42%, smaller than the maximum DGRS drawdown of -44.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QMID and DGRS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QMID | DGRS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.42% | -44.83% | +20.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.67% | -9.68% | -0.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -27.57% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.57% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -44.83% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.34% | -1.24% | -0.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.22% | -6.66% | +1.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.15% | 3.03% | +0.12% |
Volatility
QMID vs. DGRS - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Fund (QMID) and WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRS) have volatilities of 3.78% and 3.72%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QMID | DGRS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.78% | 3.72% | +0.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.87% | 10.52% | +0.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.17% | 17.17% | -2.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.23% | 20.22% | -1.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.23% | 23.57% | -5.34% |
QMID vs. DGRS - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both QMID and DGRS have an expense ratio of 0.38%.
Dividends
QMID vs. DGRS - Dividend Comparison
QMID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.49%, less than DGRS's 2.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGRS WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Fund | 2.04% | 2.68% | 2.15% | 2.36% | 2.88% | 2.19% | 2.32% | 2.39% | 2.64% | 1.90% | 1.82% | 2.55% |
QMID WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Fund | 0.49% | 0.51% | 1.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QMID and DGRS have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QMID has higher volatility (3.78%) compared to DGRS (3.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QMID dropped -24.42% vs DGRS's -44.83%.
On 1-year performance, DGRS leads with 31.79% vs 10.41% for QMID. Both ETFs have the same 0.38% expense ratio. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, DGRS has performed better with a 31.79% return vs 10.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QMID and DGRS have the same expense ratio: 0.38% per year.
DGRS has the higher dividend yield at 2.04%, compared with 0.49% for QMID.
QMID tracks WisdomTree U.S. MidCap Quality Growth Index, while DGRS tracks WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Index.
DGRS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs 0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QMID and DGRS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer