PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QMHIX vs. AHLIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QMHIX vs. AHLIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV Fund (QMHIX) and American Beacon AHL Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class R5 (AHLIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QMHIX achieves a 15.33% return, which is significantly higher than AHLIX's 12.70% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with QMHIX having a 4.99% annualized return and AHLIX not far ahead at 5.12%.


QMHIX

1D
1.16%
1M
-0.96%
YTD
15.33%
6M
16.25%
1Y
34.04%
3Y*
15.28%
5Y*
17.07%
10Y*
4.99%

AHLIX

1D
0.75%
1M
0.66%
YTD
12.70%
6M
12.46%
1Y
30.98%
3Y*
4.98%
5Y*
5.20%
10Y*
5.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QMHIX vs. AHLIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QMHIX
AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV Fund
15.33%19.97%10.78%-0.17%50.14%-2.08%-0.73%1.82%-14.44%-1.72%
AHLIX
American Beacon AHL Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class R5
12.70%2.59%2.07%-3.85%16.94%5.09%10.71%0.44%2.52%5.23%

Correlation

The correlation between QMHIX and AHLIX is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2015

0.68

The correlation between QMHIX and AHLIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (1 year) to 0.68 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QMHIX vs. AHLIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QMHIX
QMHIX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
QMHIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QMHIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
QMHIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
QMHIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
QMHIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

AHLIX
AHLIX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
AHLIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AHLIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
AHLIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
AHLIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
AHLIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QMHIX vs. AHLIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV Fund (QMHIX) and American Beacon AHL Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class R5 (AHLIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QMHIXAHLIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.53

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.18

6.39

+0.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.80

20.09

+0.71

QMHIX vs. AHLIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QMHIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.67, which is comparable to the AHLIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QMHIX and AHLIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QMHIX vs. AHLIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QMHIX drawdown since its inception was -39.37%, which is greater than AHLIX's maximum drawdown of -21.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QMHIX and AHLIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QMHIXAHLIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.37%

-21.62%

-17.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.83%

-4.91%

+0.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.06%

-21.62%

+2.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.06%

-21.62%

+2.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.54%

-21.62%

-12.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.15%

-0.19%

-2.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.75%

-6.54%

-11.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.66%

1.56%

+0.10%

Volatility

QMHIX vs. AHLIX - Volatility Comparison

AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV Fund (QMHIX) has a higher volatility of 3.97% compared to American Beacon AHL Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class R5 (AHLIX) at 2.48%. This indicates that QMHIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AHLIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QMHIXAHLIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.97%

2.48%

+1.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.92%

7.81%

+2.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.02%

10.85%

+2.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.31%

9.61%

+7.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.49%

9.48%

+6.01%

QMHIX vs. AHLIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QMHIX has a 1.65% expense ratio, which is higher than AHLIX's 1.53% expense ratio.


Dividends

QMHIX vs. AHLIX - Dividend Comparison

QMHIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.77%, less than AHLIX's 7.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AHLIX
American Beacon AHL Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class R5
7.32%8.25%0.55%1.10%17.63%7.44%5.33%4.47%1.83%4.01%0.00%3.51%
QMHIX
AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV Fund
1.77%2.05%2.31%7.66%9.34%10.96%9.52%4.18%0.00%0.00%0.01%7.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


QMHIX and AHLIX have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QMHIX has higher volatility (3.97%) compared to AHLIX (2.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QMHIX dropped -39.37% vs AHLIX's -21.62%.

AHLIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.90 vs 2.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QMHIX and AHLIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer