QLVE vs. GARP
QLVE (FlexShares Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index Fund) and GARP (iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF) are both Quality Factor funds - QLVE tracks the Northern Trust Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index while GARP tracks the MSCI USA Quality GARP Select Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QLVE returned 7.60%/yr vs 17.48%/yr for GARP. Their 0.64 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. QLVE charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for GARP.
Performance
QLVE vs. GARP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QLVE achieves a 12.92% return, which is significantly lower than GARP's 16.89% return.
QLVE
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 0.53%
- 6M
- 7.16%
- YTD
- 12.92%
- 1Y
- 23.59%
- 3Y*
- 15.27%
- 5Y*
- 7.60%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 6.66%
GARP
- 1D
- 0.66%
- 1M
- -1.22%
- 6M
- 14.45%
- YTD
- 16.89%
- 1Y
- 31.75%
- 3Y*
- 28.85%
- 5Y*
- 17.48%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 20.07%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $25.65M | $25.43M | $23.00M | |
| $2.76K | $7.65K | $20.86K |
QLVE vs. GARP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QLVE FlexShares Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index Fund | 12.92% | 21.87% | 10.17% | 8.53% | -13.10% | 0.90% | 3.19% |
GARP iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF | 16.89% | 21.49% | 37.42% | 42.86% | -26.75% | 27.99% | 26.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between QLVE and GARP is 0.77, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.65 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 16, 2020 | 0.64 |
The correlation between QLVE and GARP shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (all time) to 0.77 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
QLVE vs. GARP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QLVE
GARP
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Energy
Consumer Defensive
-
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Technology
QLVE
GARP
Financial Services
QLVE
GARP
Communication Services
QLVE
GARP
Energy
QLVE
GARP
Consumer Defensive
QLVE
GARP
-
Consumer Cyclical
QLVE
GARP
Healthcare
QLVE
GARP
Industrials
QLVE
GARP
Utilities
QLVE
GARP
Basic Materials
QLVE
GARP
Real Estate
QLVE
GARP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QLVE vs. GARP — Risk / Return Rank
QLVE
GARP
QLVE vs. GARP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLVE) and iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF (GARP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QLVE | GARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.26 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.98 | 2.19 | -0.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.52 | 7.99 | -1.48 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QLVE vs. GARP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QLVE drawdown since its inception was -29.96%, roughly equal to the maximum GARP drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLVE and GARP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QLVE | GARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.96% | -31.34% | +1.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.60% | -13.69% | +2.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.29% | -23.73% | +10.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.60% | -30.61% | +7.01% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.59% | -4.34% | -1.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.21% | -7.27% | -0.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.51% | 3.75% | -0.24% |
Volatility
QLVE vs. GARP - Volatility Comparison
FlexShares Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLVE) has a higher volatility of 6.73% compared to iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF (GARP) at 5.68%. This indicates that QLVE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GARP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QLVE | GARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.73% | 5.68% | +1.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.12% | 16.18% | +0.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.46% | 20.02% | -0.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.20% | 22.34% | -8.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.14% | 23.92% | -7.78% |
QLVE vs. GARP - Expense Ratio Comparison
QLVE has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than GARP's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
QLVE vs. GARP - Dividend Comparison
QLVE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.68%, more than GARP's 0.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GARP iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF | 0.27% | 0.31% | 0.38% | 0.75% | 1.85% | 0.67% | 0.75% | 0.00% |
QLVE FlexShares Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index Fund | 2.68% | 3.14% | 3.11% | 3.00% | 2.48% | 2.57% | 1.66% | 1.27% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QLVE and GARP have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QLVE has higher volatility (6.73%) compared to GARP (5.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QLVE dropped -29.96% vs GARP's -31.34%.
On 5-year performance, GARP leads with 17.48% vs 7.60% for QLVE. On fees, GARP is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, GARP has been the lower-risk option at 5.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, GARP has performed better with a 17.48% return vs 7.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GARP is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for QLVE.
QLVE has the higher dividend yield at 2.68%, compared with 0.27% for GARP.
QLVE tracks Northern Trust Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index, while GARP tracks MSCI USA Quality GARP Select Index. They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for QLVE and 0.15% for GARP.
GARP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QLVE and GARP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer