QLVD vs. JQUA
QLVD (FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund) and JQUA (JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF) are both Quality Factor funds - QLVD tracks the Northern Trust Developed Markets ex US Quality Low Volatility Index while JQUA tracks the JP Morgan US Quality Factor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QLVD returned 7.19%/yr vs 12.89%/yr for JQUA. Their 0.69 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. QLVD charges 0.32%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for JQUA.
Performance
QLVD vs. JQUA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QLVD achieves a 9.60% return, which is significantly lower than JQUA's 14.93% return.
QLVD
- 1D
- -0.82%
- 1M
- 3.92%
- 6M
- 7.11%
- YTD
- 9.60%
- 1Y
- 16.16%
- 3Y*
- 13.56%
- 5Y*
- 7.19%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 7.53%
JQUA
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.33%
- 6M
- 13.64%
- YTD
- 14.93%
- 1Y
- 22.21%
- 3Y*
- 18.11%
- 5Y*
- 12.89%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 14.71%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $26.79M | $28.22M | $36.46M | |
| $72.57K | $53.92K | $58.06K |
QLVD vs. JQUA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QLVD FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund | 9.60% | 24.21% | 4.67% | 11.57% | -12.09% | 9.04% | 3.00% | 6.26% |
JQUA JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF | 14.93% | 11.69% | 21.21% | 25.13% | -13.45% | 28.68% | 16.56% | 6.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between QLVD and JQUA is 0.50, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2019 | 0.69 |
The correlation between QLVD and JQUA shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (1 year) to 0.69 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
QLVD vs. JQUA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QLVD
JQUA
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Utilities
Technology
Energy
Communication Services
Real Estate
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Financial Services
QLVD
JQUA
Industrials
QLVD
JQUA
Consumer Defensive
QLVD
JQUA
Healthcare
QLVD
JQUA
Utilities
QLVD
JQUA
Technology
QLVD
JQUA
Energy
QLVD
JQUA
Communication Services
QLVD
JQUA
Real Estate
QLVD
JQUA
Consumer Cyclical
QLVD
JQUA
Basic Materials
QLVD
JQUA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QLVD vs. JQUA — Risk / Return Rank
QLVD
JQUA
QLVD vs. JQUA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLVD) and JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF (JQUA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QLVD | JQUA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.30 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.12 | 2.95 | -0.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.52 | 12.05 | -6.53 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QLVD vs. JQUA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QLVD drawdown since its inception was -28.20%, smaller than the maximum JQUA drawdown of -32.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLVD and JQUA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QLVD | JQUA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.20% | -32.92% | +4.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.15% | -7.13% | -1.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.18% | -16.81% | +7.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.99% | -22.47% | -1.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.82% | -0.36% | -0.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.20% | -4.10% | -1.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.12% | 1.74% | +1.38% |
Volatility
QLVD vs. JQUA - Volatility Comparison
FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLVD) has a higher volatility of 2.93% compared to JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF (JQUA) at 2.34%. This indicates that QLVD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JQUA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QLVD | JQUA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.93% | 2.34% | +0.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.77% | 9.47% | -0.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.60% | 12.04% | -1.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.77% | 15.72% | -3.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.90% | 17.93% | -4.03% |
QLVD vs. JQUA - Expense Ratio Comparison
QLVD has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is higher than JQUA's 0.12% expense ratio.
Dividends
QLVD vs. JQUA - Dividend Comparison
QLVD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.93%, more than JQUA's 1.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JQUA JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF | 1.08% | 1.19% | 1.24% | 1.21% | 1.60% | 1.32% | 1.44% | 1.67% | 2.10% | 0.40% |
QLVD FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund | 2.93% | 2.87% | 3.01% | 3.33% | 2.47% | 3.06% | 1.78% | 1.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QLVD and JQUA have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QLVD has higher volatility (2.93%) compared to JQUA (2.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QLVD dropped -28.20% vs JQUA's -32.92%.
On 5-year performance, JQUA leads with 12.89% vs 7.19% for QLVD. On fees, JQUA is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, JQUA has been the lower-risk option at 2.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, JQUA has performed better with a 12.89% return vs 7.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JQUA is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for QLVD.
QLVD has the higher dividend yield at 2.93%, compared with 1.08% for JQUA.
QLVD tracks Northern Trust Developed Markets ex US Quality Low Volatility Index, while JQUA tracks JP Morgan US Quality Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for QLVD and 0.12% for JQUA.
JQUA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QLVD and JQUA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer