PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QLVD vs. GARP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QLVD vs. GARP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLVD) and iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF (GARP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QLVD achieves a 9.60% return, which is significantly lower than GARP's 16.89% return.


QLVD

1D
-0.82%
1M
3.92%
6M
7.11%
YTD
9.60%
1Y
16.16%
3Y*
13.56%
5Y*
7.19%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
7.53%

GARP

1D
0.66%
1M
-1.22%
6M
14.45%
YTD
16.89%
1Y
31.75%
3Y*
28.85%
5Y*
17.48%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
20.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$25.65M$25.43M$23.00M
$72.57K$53.92K$58.06K

QLVD vs. GARP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
QLVD
FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund
9.60%24.21%4.67%11.57%-12.09%9.04%2.26%
GARP
iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF
16.89%21.49%37.42%42.86%-26.75%27.99%26.51%

Correlation

The correlation between QLVD and GARP is 0.36, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 16, 2020

0.57

Over the past year, the correlation between QLVD and GARP has dropped to 0.36 - well below their long-term average of 0.57, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

QLVD vs. GARP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QLVD
GARP

Financial Services

23.5%
7.9%

Industrials

14.7%
6.4%

Consumer Defensive

11.3%

-

Healthcare

9.5%
5.4%

Utilities

7.3%
1.3%

Technology

6.7%
54.7%

Energy

5.4%
3.0%

Communication Services

5.3%
11.0%

Real Estate

5.0%
0.4%

Consumer Cyclical

4.3%
9.1%

Basic Materials

3.9%
1.1%

Financial Services

QLVD
23.5%
GARP
7.9%

Industrials

QLVD
14.7%
GARP
6.4%

Consumer Defensive

QLVD
11.3%
GARP

-

Healthcare

QLVD
9.5%
GARP
5.4%

Utilities

QLVD
7.3%
GARP
1.3%

Technology

QLVD
6.7%
GARP
54.7%

Energy

QLVD
5.4%
GARP
3.0%

Communication Services

QLVD
5.3%
GARP
11.0%

Real Estate

QLVD
5.0%
GARP
0.4%

Consumer Cyclical

QLVD
4.3%
GARP
9.1%

Basic Materials

QLVD
3.9%
GARP
1.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QLVD vs. GARP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QLVD
QLVD Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
QLVD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QLVD Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
QLVD Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
QLVD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
QLVD Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

GARP
GARP Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
GARP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GARP Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
GARP Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
GARP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
GARP Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QLVD vs. GARP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLVD) and iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF (GARP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QLVDGARPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.26

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.12

2.19

-0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.52

7.99

-2.47

QLVD vs. GARP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QLVD Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is comparable to the GARP Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QLVD and GARP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QLVD vs. GARP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QLVD drawdown since its inception was -28.20%, smaller than the maximum GARP drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLVD and GARP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QLVDGARPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.20%

-31.34%

+3.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.15%

-13.69%

+5.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.18%

-23.73%

+14.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.99%

-30.61%

+6.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.82%

-4.34%

+3.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.20%

-7.27%

+2.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.12%

3.75%

-0.63%

Volatility

QLVD vs. GARP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLVD) is 2.93%, while iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF (GARP) has a volatility of 5.68%. This indicates that QLVD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GARP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QLVDGARPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.93%

5.68%

-2.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.77%

16.18%

-7.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.60%

20.02%

-9.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.77%

22.34%

-10.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.90%

23.92%

-10.02%

QLVD vs. GARP - Expense Ratio Comparison

QLVD has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is higher than GARP's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

QLVD vs. GARP - Dividend Comparison

QLVD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.93%, more than GARP's 0.27% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
GARP
iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF
0.27%0.31%0.38%0.75%1.85%0.67%0.75%0.00%
QLVD
FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund
2.93%2.87%3.01%3.33%2.47%3.06%1.78%1.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


QLVD and GARP have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GARP has higher volatility (5.68%) compared to QLVD (2.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QLVD dropped -28.20% vs GARP's -31.34%.

On 5-year performance, GARP leads with 17.48% vs 7.19% for QLVD. On fees, GARP is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, QLVD has been the lower-risk option at 2.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, GARP has performed better with a 17.48% return vs 7.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GARP is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for QLVD.

QLVD has the higher dividend yield at 2.93%, compared with 0.27% for GARP.

QLVD tracks Northern Trust Developed Markets ex US Quality Low Volatility Index, while GARP tracks MSCI USA Quality GARP Select Index. They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for QLVD and 0.15% for GARP.

QLVD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QLVD and GARP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer