QLVD vs. GARP
QLVD (FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund) and GARP (iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF) are both Quality Factor funds - QLVD tracks the Northern Trust Developed Markets ex US Quality Low Volatility Index while GARP tracks the MSCI USA Quality GARP Select Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QLVD returned 7.19%/yr vs 17.48%/yr for GARP. Their 0.57 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. QLVD charges 0.32%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for GARP.
Performance
QLVD vs. GARP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QLVD achieves a 9.60% return, which is significantly lower than GARP's 16.89% return.
QLVD
- 1D
- -0.82%
- 1M
- 3.92%
- 6M
- 7.11%
- YTD
- 9.60%
- 1Y
- 16.16%
- 3Y*
- 13.56%
- 5Y*
- 7.19%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 7.53%
GARP
- 1D
- 0.66%
- 1M
- -1.22%
- 6M
- 14.45%
- YTD
- 16.89%
- 1Y
- 31.75%
- 3Y*
- 28.85%
- 5Y*
- 17.48%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 20.07%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $25.65M | $25.43M | $23.00M | |
| $72.57K | $53.92K | $58.06K |
QLVD vs. GARP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QLVD FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund | 9.60% | 24.21% | 4.67% | 11.57% | -12.09% | 9.04% | 2.26% |
GARP iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF | 16.89% | 21.49% | 37.42% | 42.86% | -26.75% | 27.99% | 26.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between QLVD and GARP is 0.36, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.42 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 16, 2020 | 0.57 |
Over the past year, the correlation between QLVD and GARP has dropped to 0.36 - well below their long-term average of 0.57, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
QLVD vs. GARP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QLVD
GARP
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
Utilities
Technology
Energy
Communication Services
Real Estate
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Financial Services
QLVD
GARP
Industrials
QLVD
GARP
Consumer Defensive
QLVD
GARP
-
Healthcare
QLVD
GARP
Utilities
QLVD
GARP
Technology
QLVD
GARP
Energy
QLVD
GARP
Communication Services
QLVD
GARP
Real Estate
QLVD
GARP
Consumer Cyclical
QLVD
GARP
Basic Materials
QLVD
GARP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QLVD vs. GARP — Risk / Return Rank
QLVD
GARP
QLVD vs. GARP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLVD) and iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF (GARP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QLVD | GARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.26 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.12 | 2.19 | -0.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.52 | 7.99 | -2.47 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QLVD vs. GARP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QLVD drawdown since its inception was -28.20%, smaller than the maximum GARP drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLVD and GARP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QLVD | GARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.20% | -31.34% | +3.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.15% | -13.69% | +5.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.18% | -23.73% | +14.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.99% | -30.61% | +6.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.82% | -4.34% | +3.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.20% | -7.27% | +2.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.12% | 3.75% | -0.63% |
Volatility
QLVD vs. GARP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLVD) is 2.93%, while iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF (GARP) has a volatility of 5.68%. This indicates that QLVD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GARP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QLVD | GARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.93% | 5.68% | -2.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.77% | 16.18% | -7.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.60% | 20.02% | -9.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.77% | 22.34% | -10.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.90% | 23.92% | -10.02% |
QLVD vs. GARP - Expense Ratio Comparison
QLVD has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is higher than GARP's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
QLVD vs. GARP - Dividend Comparison
QLVD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.93%, more than GARP's 0.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GARP iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF | 0.27% | 0.31% | 0.38% | 0.75% | 1.85% | 0.67% | 0.75% | 0.00% |
QLVD FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund | 2.93% | 2.87% | 3.01% | 3.33% | 2.47% | 3.06% | 1.78% | 1.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QLVD and GARP have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GARP has higher volatility (5.68%) compared to QLVD (2.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QLVD dropped -28.20% vs GARP's -31.34%.
On 5-year performance, GARP leads with 17.48% vs 7.19% for QLVD. On fees, GARP is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, QLVD has been the lower-risk option at 2.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, GARP has performed better with a 17.48% return vs 7.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GARP is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for QLVD.
QLVD has the higher dividend yield at 2.93%, compared with 0.27% for GARP.
QLVD tracks Northern Trust Developed Markets ex US Quality Low Volatility Index, while GARP tracks MSCI USA Quality GARP Select Index. They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for QLVD and 0.15% for GARP.
QLVD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QLVD and GARP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer