QLVD vs. DGRE
QLVD (FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund) and DGRE (WisdomTree Emerging Markets Quality Dividend Growth Fund) are both Quality Factor funds. QLVD is passively managed, while DGRE is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, QLVD returned 7.19%/yr vs 8.52%/yr for DGRE. Their 0.62 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. Both charge a 0.32% expense ratio.
Performance
QLVD vs. DGRE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QLVD achieves a 9.60% return, which is significantly lower than DGRE's 22.89% return.
QLVD
- 1D
- -0.82%
- 1M
- 3.92%
- 6M
- 7.11%
- YTD
- 9.60%
- 1Y
- 16.16%
- 3Y*
- 13.56%
- 5Y*
- 7.19%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 7.53%
DGRE
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- -3.14%
- 6M
- 14.70%
- YTD
- 22.89%
- 1Y
- 42.31%
- 3Y*
- 19.58%
- 5Y*
- 8.52%
- 10Y*
- 8.22%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.82%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $225.72K | $519.73K | $485.46K | |
| $72.57K | $53.92K | $58.06K |
QLVD vs. DGRE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QLVD FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund | 9.60% | 24.21% | 4.67% | 11.57% | -12.09% | 9.04% | 3.00% | 6.26% |
DGRE WisdomTree Emerging Markets Quality Dividend Growth Fund | 22.89% | 27.47% | 3.63% | 18.46% | -21.86% | 2.55% | 10.85% | 8.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between QLVD and DGRE is 0.48, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.54 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2019 | 0.62 |
The correlation between QLVD and DGRE shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (1 year) to 0.62 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
QLVD vs. DGRE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QLVD
DGRE
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Utilities
Technology
Energy
Communication Services
Real Estate
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Financial Services
QLVD
DGRE
Industrials
QLVD
DGRE
Consumer Defensive
QLVD
DGRE
Healthcare
QLVD
DGRE
Utilities
QLVD
DGRE
Technology
QLVD
DGRE
Energy
QLVD
DGRE
Communication Services
QLVD
DGRE
Real Estate
QLVD
DGRE
Consumer Cyclical
QLVD
DGRE
Basic Materials
QLVD
DGRE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QLVD vs. DGRE — Risk / Return Rank
QLVD
DGRE
QLVD vs. DGRE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLVD) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QLVD | DGRE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.32 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.12 | 3.07 | -0.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.52 | 9.68 | -4.16 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QLVD vs. DGRE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QLVD drawdown since its inception was -28.20%, smaller than the maximum DGRE drawdown of -36.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLVD and DGRE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QLVD | DGRE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.20% | -36.95% | +8.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.15% | -13.68% | +5.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.18% | -20.65% | +11.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.99% | -33.43% | +9.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.82% | -9.16% | +8.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.20% | -11.93% | +6.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.12% | 4.33% | -1.21% |
Volatility
QLVD vs. DGRE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLVD) is 2.93%, while WisdomTree Emerging Markets Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRE) has a volatility of 8.92%. This indicates that QLVD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DGRE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QLVD | DGRE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.93% | 8.92% | -5.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.77% | 22.64% | -13.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.60% | 24.24% | -13.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.77% | 19.08% | -7.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.90% | 19.98% | -6.08% |
QLVD vs. DGRE - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both QLVD and DGRE have an expense ratio of 0.32%.
Dividends
QLVD vs. DGRE - Dividend Comparison
QLVD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.93%, more than DGRE's 1.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGRE WisdomTree Emerging Markets Quality Dividend Growth Fund | 1.35% | 1.65% | 1.90% | 2.22% | 4.38% | 2.56% | 2.11% | 2.32% | 2.71% | 3.12% | 3.18% | 3.01% |
QLVD FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund | 2.93% | 2.87% | 3.01% | 3.33% | 2.47% | 3.06% | 1.78% | 1.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QLVD and DGRE have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DGRE has higher volatility (8.92%) compared to QLVD (2.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QLVD dropped -28.20% vs DGRE's -36.95%.
On 5-year performance, DGRE leads with 8.52% vs 7.19% for QLVD. Both ETFs have the same 0.32% expense ratio. On volatility, QLVD has been the lower-risk option at 2.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DGRE has performed better with a 8.52% return vs 7.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QLVD and DGRE have the same expense ratio: 0.32% per year.
QLVD has the higher dividend yield at 2.93%, compared with 1.35% for DGRE.
They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and WisdomTree.
DGRE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QLVD and DGRE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer