PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QLVD vs. DGRE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QLVD vs. DGRE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLVD) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QLVD achieves a 9.60% return, which is significantly lower than DGRE's 22.89% return.


QLVD

1D
-0.82%
1M
3.92%
6M
7.11%
YTD
9.60%
1Y
16.16%
3Y*
13.56%
5Y*
7.19%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
7.53%

DGRE

1D
0.57%
1M
-3.14%
6M
14.70%
YTD
22.89%
1Y
42.31%
3Y*
19.58%
5Y*
8.52%
10Y*
8.22%
ALL TIME*
5.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$225.72K$519.73K$485.46K
$72.57K$53.92K$58.06K

QLVD vs. DGRE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
QLVD
FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund
9.60%24.21%4.67%11.57%-12.09%9.04%3.00%6.26%
DGRE
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Quality Dividend Growth Fund
22.89%27.47%3.63%18.46%-21.86%2.55%10.85%8.60%

Correlation

The correlation between QLVD and DGRE is 0.48, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2019

0.62

The correlation between QLVD and DGRE shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (1 year) to 0.62 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

QLVD vs. DGRE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QLVD
DGRE

Financial Services

23.5%
11.8%

Industrials

14.7%
8.0%

Consumer Defensive

11.3%
2.3%

Healthcare

9.5%
2.6%

Utilities

7.3%
0.9%

Technology

6.7%
38.6%

Energy

5.4%
1.1%

Communication Services

5.3%
0.8%

Real Estate

5.0%
0.3%

Consumer Cyclical

4.3%
2.6%

Basic Materials

3.9%
4.4%

Financial Services

QLVD
23.5%
DGRE
11.8%

Industrials

QLVD
14.7%
DGRE
8.0%

Consumer Defensive

QLVD
11.3%
DGRE
2.3%

Healthcare

QLVD
9.5%
DGRE
2.6%

Utilities

QLVD
7.3%
DGRE
0.9%

Technology

QLVD
6.7%
DGRE
38.6%

Energy

QLVD
5.4%
DGRE
1.1%

Communication Services

QLVD
5.3%
DGRE
0.8%

Real Estate

QLVD
5.0%
DGRE
0.3%

Consumer Cyclical

QLVD
4.3%
DGRE
2.6%

Basic Materials

QLVD
3.9%
DGRE
4.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QLVD vs. DGRE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QLVD
QLVD Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
QLVD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QLVD Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
QLVD Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
QLVD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
QLVD Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

DGRE
DGRE Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
DGRE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRE Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRE Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QLVD vs. DGRE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLVD) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QLVDDGREDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.32

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.12

3.07

-0.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.52

9.68

-4.16

QLVD vs. DGRE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QLVD Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is comparable to the DGRE Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QLVD and DGRE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QLVD vs. DGRE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QLVD drawdown since its inception was -28.20%, smaller than the maximum DGRE drawdown of -36.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLVD and DGRE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QLVDDGREDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.20%

-36.95%

+8.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.15%

-13.68%

+5.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.18%

-20.65%

+11.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.99%

-33.43%

+9.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.82%

-9.16%

+8.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.20%

-11.93%

+6.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.12%

4.33%

-1.21%

Volatility

QLVD vs. DGRE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLVD) is 2.93%, while WisdomTree Emerging Markets Quality Dividend Growth Fund (DGRE) has a volatility of 8.92%. This indicates that QLVD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DGRE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QLVDDGREDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.93%

8.92%

-5.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.77%

22.64%

-13.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.60%

24.24%

-13.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.77%

19.08%

-7.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.90%

19.98%

-6.08%

QLVD vs. DGRE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both QLVD and DGRE have an expense ratio of 0.32%.


Dividends

QLVD vs. DGRE - Dividend Comparison

QLVD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.93%, more than DGRE's 1.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGRE
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Quality Dividend Growth Fund
1.35%1.65%1.90%2.22%4.38%2.56%2.11%2.32%2.71%3.12%3.18%3.01%
QLVD
FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund
2.93%2.87%3.01%3.33%2.47%3.06%1.78%1.06%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QLVD and DGRE have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DGRE has higher volatility (8.92%) compared to QLVD (2.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QLVD dropped -28.20% vs DGRE's -36.95%.

On 5-year performance, DGRE leads with 8.52% vs 7.19% for QLVD. Both ETFs have the same 0.32% expense ratio. On volatility, QLVD has been the lower-risk option at 2.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DGRE has performed better with a 8.52% return vs 7.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QLVD and DGRE have the same expense ratio: 0.32% per year.

QLVD has the higher dividend yield at 2.93%, compared with 1.35% for DGRE.

They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and WisdomTree.

DGRE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QLVD and DGRE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer