QLV vs. FLLV
QLV (FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund) and FLLV (Franklin Liberty U.S. Low Volatility ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QLV is a Quality Factor fund tracking the Northern Trust Quality Low Volatility Index, while FLLV is a Low Volatility fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton. QLV is passively managed, while FLLV is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, QLV returned 10.05%/yr vs 10.63%/yr for FLLV. Their correlation of 0.90 means they have usually moved in the same direction. QLV charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for FLLV.
Performance
QLV vs. FLLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QLV achieves a 9.55% return, which is significantly lower than FLLV's 15.51% return.
QLV
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- 1.91%
- 6M
- 6.89%
- YTD
- 9.55%
- 1Y
- 16.70%
- 3Y*
- 15.60%
- 5Y*
- 10.05%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 11.67%
FLLV
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- 1.48%
- 6M
- 8.30%
- YTD
- 15.51%
- 1Y
- 26.66%
- 3Y*
- 16.30%
- 5Y*
- 10.63%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 13.11%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $14.27M | $7.17M | $3.19M | |
| $571.44K | $481.55K | $516.78K |
QLV vs. FLLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QLV FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund | 9.55% | 12.28% | 18.08% | 13.71% | -9.97% | 26.08% | 9.63% | 5.97% |
FLLV Franklin Liberty U.S. Low Volatility ETF | 15.51% | 15.92% | 10.70% | 13.87% | -8.54% | 23.36% | 12.33% | 5.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between QLV and FLLV is 0.72, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.81 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2019 | 0.90 |
The correlation between QLV and FLLV shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (1 year) to 0.90 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
QLV vs. FLLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QLV
FLLV
Technology
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Energy
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
QLV
FLLV
Healthcare
QLV
FLLV
Financial Services
QLV
FLLV
Consumer Defensive
QLV
FLLV
Communication Services
QLV
FLLV
Energy
QLV
FLLV
Utilities
QLV
FLLV
Consumer Cyclical
QLV
FLLV
Industrials
QLV
FLLV
Real Estate
QLV
FLLV
Basic Materials
QLV
FLLV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QLV vs. FLLV — Risk / Return Rank
QLV
FLLV
QLV vs. FLLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLV) and Franklin Liberty U.S. Low Volatility ETF (FLLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QLV | FLLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.60 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.71 | 5.46 | -2.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.17 | 21.07 | -9.90 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QLV vs. FLLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QLV drawdown since its inception was -33.71%, roughly equal to the maximum FLLV drawdown of -33.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLV and FLLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QLV | FLLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.71% | -33.95% | +0.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.19% | -4.90% | -1.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.05% | -14.01% | +1.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.93% | -18.40% | +0.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.93% | -3.21% | -0.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.50% | 1.27% | +0.23% |
Volatility
QLV vs. FLLV - Volatility Comparison
FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLV) and Franklin Liberty U.S. Low Volatility ETF (FLLV) have volatilities of 2.30% and 2.30%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QLV | FLLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.30% | 2.30% | 0.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.98% | 6.15% | -0.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.88% | 8.33% | -0.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.64% | 13.26% | -0.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.43% | 15.60% | +0.83% |
QLV vs. FLLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
QLV has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than FLLV's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
QLV vs. FLLV - Dividend Comparison
QLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%, less than FLLV's 4.82% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLLV Franklin Liberty U.S. Low Volatility ETF | 4.82% | 4.71% | 3.25% | 1.75% | 1.68% | 1.41% | 1.40% | 1.31% | 1.55% | 1.44% | 0.50% |
QLV FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund | 1.52% | 1.60% | 1.66% | 1.60% | 1.74% | 0.96% | 1.24% | 0.58% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QLV and FLLV have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FLLV has higher volatility (2.30%) compared to QLV (2.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QLV dropped -33.71% vs FLLV's -33.95%.
On 5-year performance, FLLV leads with 10.63% vs 10.05% for QLV. On fees, QLV is cheaper at 0.22% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FLLV has performed better with a 10.63% return vs 10.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QLV is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for FLLV.
FLLV has the higher dividend yield at 4.82%, compared with 1.52% for QLV.
QLV is categorized as Quality Factor, while FLLV is Low Volatility. They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for QLV and 0.29% for FLLV.
FLLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.22 vs 2.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QLV and FLLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer