QLV vs. EQLT

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

QLV (FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund) and EQLT (iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Quality Factor ETF) are both Quality Factor funds - QLV tracks the Northern Trust Quality Low Volatility Index while EQLT tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Quality Factor Select Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, QLV returned 16.70% vs 47.25% for EQLT. Their 0.37 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. QLV charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for EQLT.

Performance

QLV vs. EQLT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLV) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Quality Factor ETF (EQLT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QLV achieves a 9.55% return, which is significantly lower than EQLT's 25.30% return.

QLV

• 1D: 0.50%
• 1M: 1.91%
• 6M: 6.89%
• YTD: 9.55%
• 1Y: 16.70%
• 3Y*: 15.60%
• 5Y*: 10.05%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 11.67%

EQLT

• 1D: 1.99%
• 1M: 0.61%
• 6M: 15.96%
• YTD: 25.30%
• 1Y: 47.25%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 30.32%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
EQLT iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Quality Factor ETF	$66.04K	$56.95K	$121.40K
QLV FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund	$571.44K	$481.55K	$516.78K

QLV vs. EQLT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
QLV FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund	9.55%	12.28%	1.76%
EQLT iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Quality Factor ETF	25.30%	33.93%	-1.29%

Correlation

The correlation between QLV and EQLT is 0.34, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.34
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 6, 2024	0.37

QLV vs. EQLT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QLV	EQLT
Technology	30.2%	34.8%
Healthcare	14.1%	3.3%
Financial Services	12.3%	19.5%
Consumer Defensive	7.8%	3.5%
Communication Services	7.4%	5.2%
Energy	6.5%	3.5%
Utilities	6.4%	1.8%
Consumer Cyclical	6.4%	8.2%
Industrials	6.3%	11.4%
Real Estate	1.4%	0.9%
Basic Materials	1.3%	6.5%

Return for Risk

QLV vs. EQLT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QLV

QLV Risk / Return Rank: 83
QLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
QLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
QLV Omega Ratio Rank: 85
QLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
QLV Martin Ratio Rank: 81

EQLT

EQLT Risk / Return Rank: 82
EQLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
EQLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
EQLT Omega Ratio Rank: 80
EQLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
EQLT Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QLV vs. EQLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLV) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Quality Factor ETF (EQLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QLV	EQLT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.13	2.03	+0.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.13	2.63	+0.50
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.36	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.71	3.96	-1.25
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.17	11.90	-0.73

QLV vs. EQLT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QLV Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is comparable to the EQLT Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QLV and EQLT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QLV vs. EQLT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QLV drawdown since its inception was -33.71%, which is greater than EQLT's maximum drawdown of -17.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLV and EQLT.

Drawdown Indicators

	QLV	EQLT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.71%	-17.38%	-16.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.19%	-12.00%	+5.81%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.05%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.93%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-6.54%	+6.54%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.93%	-3.81%	-0.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.50%	3.98%	-2.48%

Volatility

QLV vs. EQLT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLV) is 2.30%, while iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Quality Factor ETF (EQLT) has a volatility of 6.29%. This indicates that QLV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EQLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QLV	EQLT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.30%	6.29%	-3.99%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.98%	21.12%	-15.14%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.88%	23.48%	-15.60%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.64%	21.27%	-8.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.43%	21.27%	-4.84%

QLV vs. EQLT - Expense Ratio Comparison

QLV has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than EQLT's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

QLV vs. EQLT - Dividend Comparison

QLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%, less than EQLT's 2.80% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
EQLT iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Quality Factor ETF	2.80%	3.10%	0.51%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QLV FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund	1.52%	1.60%	1.66%	1.60%	1.74%	0.96%	1.24%	0.58%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QLV and EQLT in my portfolio?

QLV and EQLT have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QLV or EQLT?

EQLT has higher volatility (6.29%) compared to QLV (2.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QLV dropped -33.71% vs EQLT's -17.38%.

Which ETF is better, QLV or EQLT?

On 1-year performance, EQLT leads with 47.25% vs 16.70% for QLV. On fees, QLV is cheaper at 0.22% per year. On volatility, QLV has been the lower-risk option at 2.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QLV or EQLT?

Over the 1-year period, EQLT has performed better with a 47.25% return vs 16.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QLV or EQLT?

QLV is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for EQLT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QLV or EQLT?

EQLT has the higher dividend yield at 2.80%, compared with 1.52% for QLV.

What is the main difference between QLV and EQLT?

QLV tracks Northern Trust Quality Low Volatility Index, while EQLT tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Quality Factor Select Index. They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for QLV and 0.35% for EQLT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 2.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.