QLTY vs. MSIF

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

QLTY (GMO U.S. Quality ETF) is Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P 500, while MSIF (MSC Income Fund, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past year, QLTY returned 23.44% vs -24.92% for MSIF. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

QLTY vs. MSIF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GMO U.S. Quality ETF (QLTY) and MSC Income Fund, Inc. (MSIF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QLTY achieves a 5.56% return, which is significantly higher than MSIF's -10.68% return.

QLTY

• 1D: -0.98%
• 1M: -1.19%
• YTD: 5.56%
• 6M: 4.84%
• 1Y: 23.44%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MSIF

• 1D: 0.71%
• 1M: -3.47%
• YTD: -10.68%
• 6M: -8.62%
• 1Y: -24.92%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QLTY vs. MSIF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
QLTY GMO U.S. Quality ETF	5.56%	16.38%
MSIF MSC Income Fund, Inc.	-10.68%	-6.00%

Correlation

The correlation between QLTY and MSIF is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.27
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 29, 2025	0.32

Return for Risk

QLTY vs. MSIF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QLTY

QLTY Risk / Return Rank: 53
QLTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
QLTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
QLTY Omega Ratio Rank: 56
QLTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
QLTY Martin Ratio Rank: 51

MSIF

MSIF Risk / Return Rank: 8
MSIF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
MSIF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
MSIF Omega Ratio Rank: 10
MSIF Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
MSIF Martin Ratio Rank: 8

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QLTY vs. MSIF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GMO U.S. Quality ETF (QLTY) and MSC Income Fund, Inc. (MSIF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QLTY	MSIF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.87	-0.93	+2.80
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.65	-1.31	+3.96
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	0.86	+0.47
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.01	-0.93	+2.94
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.15	-1.44	+9.59

QLTY vs. MSIF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QLTY Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is higher than the MSIF Sharpe Ratio of -0.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QLTY and MSIF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QLTY vs. MSIF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QLTY drawdown since its inception was -17.00%, smaller than the maximum MSIF drawdown of -30.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLTY and MSIF.

Drawdown Indicators

	QLTY	MSIF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.00%	-30.63%	+13.63%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.71%	-26.92%	+15.21%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.89%	-29.51%	+26.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.04%	-16.74%	+14.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.88%	17.33%	-14.45%

Volatility

QLTY vs. MSIF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GMO U.S. Quality ETF (QLTY) is 4.05%, while MSC Income Fund, Inc. (MSIF) has a volatility of 7.97%. This indicates that QLTY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSIF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QLTY	MSIF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.05%	7.97%	-3.92%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.74%	18.77%	-9.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.65%	27.00%	-14.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.68%	29.47%	-14.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.68%	29.47%	-14.79%

Dividends

QLTY vs. MSIF - Dividend Comparison

QLTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.72%, less than MSIF's 12.64% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
MSIF MSC Income Fund, Inc.	12.64%	10.96%	0.00%	0.00%
QLTY GMO U.S. Quality ETF	0.72%	0.73%	0.79%	0.15%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QLTY and MSIF in my portfolio?

QLTY and MSIF have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QLTY or MSIF?

MSIF has higher volatility (7.97%) compared to QLTY (4.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QLTY dropped -17.00% vs MSIF's -30.63%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QLTY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs -0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.