QLTY vs. VOO

In the year-to-date period, QLTY achieves a 1.47% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 0.46% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

QLTY has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GMO U.S. Quality ETF (QLTY) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current QLTY Sharpe Ratio is 0.54, which is comparable to the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 0.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QLTY and VOO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

QLTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.79%, less than VOO's 1.29% yield.

The maximum QLTY drawdown since its inception was -17.00%, smaller than the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLTY and VOO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

GMO U.S. Quality ETF (QLTY) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) have volatilities of 6.16% and 6.22%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.