PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QLTY vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

QLTY vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GMO U.S. Quality ETF (QLTY) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

QLTY vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
QLTY
GMO U.S. Quality ETF
-5.77%21.26%21.02%5.68%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
-4.42%17.82%24.98%6.17%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QLTY achieves a -5.77% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's -4.42% return.


QLTY

1D
2.76%
1M
-6.42%
YTD
-5.77%
6M
0.36%
1Y
16.68%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

VOO

1D
2.86%
1M
-5.01%
YTD
-4.42%
6M
-1.84%
1Y
17.67%
3Y*
18.27%
5Y*
11.75%
10Y*
14.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QLTY vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

QLTY has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

QLTY vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QLTY
QLTY Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
QLTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QLTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
QLTY Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
QLTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
QLTY Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QLTY vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GMO U.S. Quality ETF (QLTY) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QLTYVOODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.94

0.98

-0.04

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.50

1.50

0.00

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.23

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.51

1.53

-0.02

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.83

7.29

-1.47

QLTY vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QLTY Sharpe Ratio is 0.94, which is comparable to the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 0.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QLTY and VOO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QLTYVOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

0.98

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.18

0.83

+0.35

Correlation

The correlation between QLTY and VOO is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

QLTY vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

QLTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%, less than VOO's 1.19% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QLTY
GMO U.S. Quality ETF
0.81%0.73%0.79%0.15%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.19%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Drawdowns

QLTY vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QLTY drawdown since its inception was -17.00%, smaller than the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLTY and VOO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


QLTYVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.00%

-33.99%

+16.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.71%

-11.98%

+0.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.28%

-6.29%

-2.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.09%

-3.72%

+1.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.04%

2.52%

+0.52%

Volatility

QLTY vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

GMO U.S. Quality ETF (QLTY) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) have volatilities of 5.28% and 5.29%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


QLTYVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.28%

5.29%

-0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.73%

9.44%

+0.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.77%

18.10%

-0.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.81%

16.82%

-2.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.81%

17.99%

-3.18%