QLTI vs. JIVE
QLTI (GMO International Quality ETF) and JIVE (Jpmorgan International Value ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, QLTI returned 3.61% vs 42.79% for JIVE. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QLTI charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for JIVE.
Performance
QLTI vs. JIVE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QLTI achieves a -1.50% return, which is significantly lower than JIVE's 15.75% return.
QLTI
- 1D
- -0.57%
- 1M
- 2.60%
- YTD
- -1.50%
- 6M
- 0.16%
- 1Y
- 3.61%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JIVE
- 1D
- -1.02%
- 1M
- 4.12%
- YTD
- 15.75%
- 6M
- 20.07%
- 1Y
- 42.79%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QLTI vs. JIVE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
QLTI GMO International Quality ETF | -1.50% | 17.12% | -8.17% |
JIVE Jpmorgan International Value ETF | 15.75% | 49.80% | -2.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between QLTI and JIVE is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2024 | 0.73 |
The correlation between QLTI and JIVE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QLTI vs. JIVE — Risk / Return Rank
QLTI
JIVE
QLTI vs. JIVE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GMO International Quality ETF (QLTI) and Jpmorgan International Value ETF (JIVE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QLTI | JIVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.74 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.53 | -0.47 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.26 | 4.07 | -3.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.76 | 15.74 | -14.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QLTI | JIVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 | 2.98 | -2.74 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.22 | 2.01 | -1.78 |
Drawdowns
QLTI vs. JIVE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QLTI drawdown since its inception was -14.82%, which is greater than JIVE's maximum drawdown of -13.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLTI and JIVE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QLTI | JIVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.82% | -13.79% | -1.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.72% | -10.57% | -3.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.89% | -1.02% | -5.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.77% | -1.96% | -1.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.77% | 2.73% | +2.04% |
Volatility
QLTI vs. JIVE - Volatility Comparison
GMO International Quality ETF (QLTI) and Jpmorgan International Value ETF (JIVE) have volatilities of 4.91% and 4.93%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QLTI | JIVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.91% | 4.93% | -0.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.38% | 11.99% | +0.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.30% | 14.46% | +0.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.69% | 14.97% | +1.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.69% | 14.97% | +1.72% |
QLTI vs. JIVE - Expense Ratio Comparison
QLTI has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than JIVE's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
QLTI vs. JIVE - Dividend Comparison
QLTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%, less than JIVE's 2.48% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
JIVE Jpmorgan International Value ETF | 2.48% | 2.88% | 2.48% | 0.74% |
QLTI GMO International Quality ETF | 0.53% | 0.52% | 0.19% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QLTI and JIVE have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JIVE has higher volatility (4.93%) compared to QLTI (4.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QLTI dropped -14.82% vs JIVE's -13.79%.
On 1-year performance, JIVE leads with 42.79% vs 3.61% for QLTI. On fees, JIVE is cheaper at 0.55% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, JIVE has performed better with a 42.79% return vs 3.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JIVE is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QLTI.
JIVE has the higher dividend yield at 2.48%, compared with 0.53% for QLTI.
They also come from different issuers: GMO and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for QLTI and 0.55% for JIVE.
JIVE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.98 vs 0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QLTI and JIVE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer