QLFRX vs. FLSPX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

QLFRX (AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class R6) and FLSPX (Meeder Spectrum Fund) are both Long-Short funds. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QLFRX charges 6.20%/yr vs 1.52%/yr for FLSPX.

Performance

QLFRX vs. FLSPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class R6 (QLFRX) and Meeder Spectrum Fund (FLSPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QLFRX achieves a 0.83% return, which is significantly lower than FLSPX's 11.48% return.

QLFRX

• 1D: 2.19%
• 1M: 6.59%
• YTD: 0.83%
• 6M: 4.00%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FLSPX

• 1D: 0.30%
• 1M: 4.47%
• YTD: 11.48%
• 6M: 12.41%
• 1Y: 29.66%
• 3Y*: 21.41%
• 5Y*: 12.38%
• 10Y*: 10.90%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QLFRX vs. FLSPX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
QLFRX AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class R6	0.83%	6.80%
FLSPX Meeder Spectrum Fund	11.48%	2.74%

Correlation

The correlation between QLFRX and FLSPX is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2025	0.71

Return for Risk

QLFRX vs. FLSPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLSPX

FLSPX Risk / Return Rank: 74
FLSPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
FLSPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
FLSPX Omega Ratio Rank: 65
FLSPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
FLSPX Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QLFRX vs. FLSPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class R6 (QLFRX) and Meeder Spectrum Fund (FLSPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QLFRX	FLSPX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.56	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.93	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.80	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.94	0.72	+0.22

Drawdowns

QLFRX vs. FLSPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QLFRX drawdown since its inception was -14.53%, smaller than the maximum FLSPX drawdown of -27.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLFRX and FLSPX.

Drawdown Indicators

	QLFRX	FLSPX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.53%	-27.07%	+12.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-8.73%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-16.23%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-20.01%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-27.07%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.41%	0.00%	-0.41%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.71%	-5.69%	-0.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.02%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	QLFRX	FLSPX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.29%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	9.06%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.94%	12.04%	+3.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.94%	13.36%	+2.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.94%	13.63%	+2.31%

QLFRX vs. FLSPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QLFRX has a 6.20% expense ratio, which is higher than FLSPX's 1.52% expense ratio.

Dividends

QLFRX vs. FLSPX - Dividend Comparison

QLFRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%, less than FLSPX's 4.06% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FLSPX Meeder Spectrum Fund	4.06%	4.32%	17.39%	8.41%	2.81%	5.55%	0.09%	0.96%	1.26%	6.78%	2.52%	1.55%
QLFRX AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class R6	0.22%	0.22%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QLFRX and FLSPX in my portfolio?

QLFRX and FLSPX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.