PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLSPX vs. FLRUX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FLSPX vs. FLRUX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Meeder Spectrum Fund (FLSPX) and Meeder Conservative Allocation Fund (FLRUX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLSPX achieves a 11.81% return, which is significantly higher than FLRUX's 4.14% return. Over the past 10 years, FLSPX has outperformed FLRUX with an annualized return of 10.94%, while FLRUX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.79% annualized return.


FLSPX

1D
0.30%
1M
5.31%
YTD
11.81%
6M
12.53%
1Y
29.57%
3Y*
21.54%
5Y*
12.51%
10Y*
10.94%

FLRUX

1D
0.16%
1M
2.04%
YTD
4.14%
6M
4.10%
1Y
11.78%
3Y*
8.89%
5Y*
3.90%
10Y*
4.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FLSPX vs. FLRUX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FLSPX
Meeder Spectrum Fund
11.81%16.15%27.96%14.00%-11.49%20.56%-0.23%13.03%-3.96%19.30%
FLRUX
Meeder Conservative Allocation Fund
4.14%8.55%6.53%9.67%-10.23%4.64%6.28%10.25%-2.61%7.64%

Correlation

The correlation between FLSPX and FLRUX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 7, 2015

0.78

The correlation between FLSPX and FLRUX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FLSPX vs. FLRUX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLSPX
FLSPX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
FLSPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLSPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLSPX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
FLSPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLSPX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

FLRUX
FLRUX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
FLRUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLRUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLRUX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
FLRUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLRUX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLSPX vs. FLRUX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Meeder Spectrum Fund (FLSPX) and Meeder Conservative Allocation Fund (FLRUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLSPXFLRUXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.51

2.28

+0.23

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.44

3.31

+0.13

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.44

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.46

2.70

+0.76

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.91

11.35

+3.56

FLSPX vs. FLRUX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLSPX Sharpe Ratio is 2.51, which is comparable to the FLRUX Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLSPX and FLRUX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLSPXFLRUXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.51

2.28

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

0.63

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

0.71

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.72

0.40

+0.32

Drawdowns

FLSPX vs. FLRUX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLSPX drawdown since its inception was -27.07%, smaller than the maximum FLRUX drawdown of -52.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLSPX and FLRUX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FLSPXFLRUXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.07%

-52.36%

+25.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.73%

-4.44%

-4.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.23%

-6.21%

-10.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.01%

-16.32%

-3.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.07%

-16.32%

-10.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.69%

-9.73%

+4.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.02%

1.05%

+0.97%

Volatility

FLSPX vs. FLRUX - Volatility Comparison

Meeder Spectrum Fund (FLSPX) has a higher volatility of 3.29% compared to Meeder Conservative Allocation Fund (FLRUX) at 1.84%. This indicates that FLSPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLRUX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FLSPXFLRUXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.29%

1.84%

+1.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.06%

4.29%

+4.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.02%

5.26%

+6.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.36%

6.25%

+7.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.63%

6.76%

+6.87%

FLSPX vs. FLRUX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FLSPX has a 1.52% expense ratio, which is higher than FLRUX's 1.21% expense ratio.


Dividends

FLSPX vs. FLRUX - Dividend Comparison

FLSPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.05%, more than FLRUX's 3.57% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLRUX
Meeder Conservative Allocation Fund
3.57%3.69%2.72%2.78%1.77%5.82%1.48%2.14%3.67%1.81%2.07%38.78%
FLSPX
Meeder Spectrum Fund
4.05%4.32%17.39%8.41%2.81%5.55%0.09%0.96%1.26%6.78%2.52%1.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


FLSPX and FLRUX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLSPX has higher volatility (3.29%) compared to FLRUX (1.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FLSPX dropped -27.07% vs FLRUX's -52.36%.

FLSPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FLSPX and FLRUX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer