PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QLFNX vs. QSPRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

QLFNX vs. QSPRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class N (QLFNX) and AQR Style Premia Alternative R6 (QSPRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

QLFNX vs. QSPRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
QLFNX
AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class N
-13.14%6.71%
QSPRX
AQR Style Premia Alternative R6
9.99%-1.19%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QLFNX achieves a -13.14% return, which is significantly lower than QSPRX's 9.99% return.


QLFNX

1D
0.38%
1M
-8.82%
YTD
-13.14%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QSPRX

1D
-0.10%
1M
3.90%
YTD
9.99%
6M
12.27%
1Y
14.10%
3Y*
20.09%
5Y*
18.79%
10Y*
7.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QLFNX vs. QSPRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QLFNX has a 6.55% expense ratio, which is higher than QSPRX's 5.79% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

QLFNX vs. QSPRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QLFNX

QSPRX
QSPRX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
QSPRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QSPRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
QSPRX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
QSPRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
QSPRX Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QLFNX vs. QSPRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class N (QLFNX) and AQR Style Premia Alternative R6 (QSPRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

QLFNX vs. QSPRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QLFNXQSPRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.43

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-1.22

0.57

-1.79

Correlation

The correlation between QLFNX and QSPRX is 0.10, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

QLFNX vs. QSPRX - Dividend Comparison

QLFNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.16%, less than QSPRX's 2.39% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QLFNX
AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class N
0.16%0.14%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QSPRX
AQR Style Premia Alternative R6
2.39%2.63%6.99%23.75%22.67%12.85%0.00%1.62%1.09%7.15%1.74%5.87%

Drawdowns

QLFNX vs. QSPRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QLFNX drawdown since its inception was -14.54%, smaller than the maximum QSPRX drawdown of -41.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLFNX and QSPRX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


QLFNXQSPRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.54%

-41.22%

+26.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.22%

-0.10%

-14.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.03%

-10.21%

+5.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.70%

Volatility

QLFNX vs. QSPRX - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


QLFNXQSPRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.65%

10.13%

+5.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.65%

16.03%

-0.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.65%

12.80%

+2.85%