QLFNX vs. QMFIX
QLFNX (AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class N) and QMFIX (AQR MS Fusion Fund Class I) are both mutual funds - QLFNX is a Long-Short fund actively managed by AQR, while QMFIX is a Multistrategy fund actively managed by AQR. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QLFNX charges 6.55%/yr vs 3.55%/yr for QMFIX.
Performance
QLFNX vs. QMFIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QLFNX achieves a -4.08% return, which is significantly lower than QMFIX's 6.54% return.
QLFNX
- 1D
- -2.78%
- 1M
- -1.03%
- YTD
- -4.08%
- 6M
- -5.26%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QMFIX
- 1D
- -1.93%
- 1M
- -1.05%
- YTD
- 6.54%
- 6M
- 5.89%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QLFNX vs. QMFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QLFNX AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class N | -4.08% | 6.71% |
QMFIX AQR MS Fusion Fund Class I | 6.54% | 3.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between QLFNX and QMFIX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2025 | 0.90 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QLFNX vs. QMFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class N (QLFNX) and AQR MS Fusion Fund Class I (QMFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QLFNX vs. QMFIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QLFNX drawdown since its inception was -14.54%, which is greater than QMFIX's maximum drawdown of -10.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLFNX and QMFIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QLFNX | QMFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.54% | -10.27% | -4.27% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.26% | -4.46% | -0.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.49% | -2.30% | -3.19% |
Volatility
QLFNX vs. QMFIX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QLFNX | QMFIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.92% | 15.08% | +1.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.92% | 15.08% | +1.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.92% | 15.08% | +1.84% |
QLFNX vs. QMFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
QLFNX has a 6.55% expense ratio, which is higher than QMFIX's 3.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
QLFNX vs. QMFIX - Dividend Comparison
QLFNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, less than QMFIX's 0.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
QLFNX AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class N | 0.14% | 0.14% |
QMFIX AQR MS Fusion Fund Class I | 0.43% | 0.46% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, QLFNX and QMFIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
Find the right allocation for QLFNX and QMFIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer