PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QLFIX vs. QLFRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QLFIX vs. QLFRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class I (QLFIX) and AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class R6 (QLFRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

As of year-to-date, both investments have demonstrated similar returns, with QLFIX at 0.25% and QLFRX at 0.25%.


QLFIX

1D
-0.25%
1M
5.60%
YTD
0.25%
6M
3.48%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QLFRX

1D
-0.33%
1M
5.51%
YTD
0.25%
6M
3.40%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QLFIX vs. QLFRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
QLFIX
AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class I
0.25%6.78%
QLFRX
AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class R6
0.25%6.80%

Correlation

The correlation between QLFIX and QLFRX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2025

1.00

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QLFIX vs. QLFRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class I (QLFIX) and AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class R6 (QLFRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

QLFIX vs. QLFRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QLFIXQLFRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.86

0.85

0.00

Drawdowns

QLFIX vs. QLFRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QLFIX drawdown since its inception was -14.53%, roughly equal to the maximum QLFRX drawdown of -14.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLFIX and QLFRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QLFIXQLFRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.53%

-14.53%

0.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.99%

-0.99%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.66%

-5.64%

-0.02%

Volatility

QLFIX vs. QLFRX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QLFIXQLFRXDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.79%

15.84%

-0.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.79%

15.84%

-0.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.79%

15.84%

-0.05%

QLFIX vs. QLFRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QLFIX has a 6.30% expense ratio, which is higher than QLFRX's 6.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

QLFIX vs. QLFRX - Dividend Comparison

QLFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.21%, less than QLFRX's 0.22% yield.


PositionTTM2025
QLFIX
AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class I
0.21%0.21%
QLFRX
AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class R6
0.22%0.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, QLFIX and QLFRX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QLFIX and QLFRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer