PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QLFIX vs. QLFNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QLFIX vs. QLFNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class I (QLFIX) and AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class N (QLFNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

As of year-to-date, both investments have demonstrated similar returns, with QLFIX at -1.33% and QLFNX at -1.33%.


QLFIX

1D
0.51%
1M
1.80%
YTD
-1.33%
6M
-2.55%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QLFNX

1D
0.59%
1M
1.80%
YTD
-1.33%
6M
-2.55%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QLFIX vs. QLFNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
QLFIX
AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class I
-1.33%6.78%
QLFNX
AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class N
-1.33%6.71%

Correlation

The correlation between QLFIX and QLFNX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2025

1.00

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QLFIX vs. QLFNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class I (QLFIX) and AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class N (QLFNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

QLFIX vs. QLFNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QLFIX vs. QLFNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QLFIX drawdown since its inception was -14.53%, roughly equal to the maximum QLFNX drawdown of -14.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLFIX and QLFNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QLFIXQLFNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.53%

-14.54%

+0.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.55%

-2.55%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.47%

-5.49%

+0.02%

Volatility

QLFIX vs. QLFNX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QLFIXQLFNXDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.55%

16.57%

-0.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.55%

16.57%

-0.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.55%

16.57%

-0.02%

QLFIX vs. QLFNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QLFIX has a 6.30% expense ratio, which is lower than QLFNX's 6.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

QLFIX vs. QLFNX - Dividend Comparison

QLFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%, more than QLFNX's 0.14% yield.


PositionTTM2025
QLFIX
AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class I
0.22%0.21%
QLFNX
AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class N
0.14%0.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, QLFIX and QLFNX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QLFIX and QLFNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer