PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QLFIX vs. QLENX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

QLFIX vs. QLENX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class I (QLFIX) and AQR Long-Short Equity N (QLENX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

QLFIX vs. QLENX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
QLFIX
AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class I
-13.13%6.78%
QLENX
AQR Long-Short Equity N
-3.31%6.64%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QLFIX achieves a -13.13% return, which is significantly lower than QLENX's -3.31% return.


QLFIX

1D
0.38%
1M
-8.81%
YTD
-13.13%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QLENX

1D
0.56%
1M
-2.74%
YTD
-3.31%
6M
4.39%
1Y
19.30%
3Y*
26.24%
5Y*
22.20%
10Y*
11.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QLFIX vs. QLENX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QLFIX has a 6.30% expense ratio, which is higher than QLENX's 5.18% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

QLFIX vs. QLENX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QLFIX

QLENX
QLENX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
QLENX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QLENX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
QLENX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
QLENX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
QLENX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QLFIX vs. QLENX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class I (QLFIX) and AQR Long-Short Equity N (QLENX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

QLFIX vs. QLENX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QLFIXQLENXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

2.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-1.22

1.21

-2.42

Correlation

The correlation between QLFIX and QLENX is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

QLFIX vs. QLENX - Dividend Comparison

QLFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.25%, less than QLENX's 1.69% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QLFIX
AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class I
0.25%0.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QLENX
AQR Long-Short Equity N
1.69%1.64%7.13%21.21%14.09%0.00%1.59%0.00%6.09%8.91%2.87%4.91%

Drawdowns

QLFIX vs. QLENX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QLFIX drawdown since its inception was -14.53%, smaller than the maximum QLENX drawdown of -38.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLFIX and QLENX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


QLFIXQLENXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.53%

-38.50%

+23.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.20%

-3.91%

-10.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.02%

-7.55%

+2.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.65%

Volatility

QLFIX vs. QLENX - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


QLFIXQLENXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.55%

8.66%

+6.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.55%

10.22%

+5.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.55%

10.55%

+5.00%