QLENX vs. COAGX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

QLENX (AQR Long-Short Equity N) and COAGX (Caldwell & Orkin - Gator Capital Long/Short Fund) are both Long-Short funds. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QLENX charges 5.18%/yr vs 2.00%/yr for COAGX.

Performance

QLENX vs. COAGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AQR Long-Short Equity N (QLENX) and Caldwell & Orkin - Gator Capital Long/Short Fund (COAGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

QLENX

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: 3.16%
• YTD: 0.10%
• 6M: 3.83%
• 1Y: 15.72%
• 3Y*: 27.31%
• 5Y*: 21.48%
• 10Y*: 11.70%

COAGX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QLENX vs. COAGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
QLENX AQR Long-Short Equity N	0.10%	34.07%	30.18%	23.67%	18.92%	30.70%	-14.18%	1.01%	-16.64%	15.48%
COAGX Caldwell & Orkin - Gator Capital Long/Short Fund	3.61%	17.44%	35.58%	31.98%	-7.18%	27.17%	11.06%	24.20%	-15.53%	0.93%

Correlation

The correlation between QLENX and COAGX is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.21
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.38
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.42
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.45
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2013	0.44

Over the past year, the correlation between QLENX and COAGX has dropped to 0.21 - well below their long-term average of 0.44, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

QLENX vs. COAGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QLENX

QLENX Risk / Return Rank: 48
QLENX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
QLENX Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
QLENX Omega Ratio Rank: 51
QLENX Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
QLENX Martin Ratio Rank: 36

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QLENX vs. COAGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR Long-Short Equity N (QLENX) and Caldwell & Orkin - Gator Capital Long/Short Fund (COAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QLENX	COAGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.16	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.18	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.56	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.00	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QLENX	COAGX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.16	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	2.14	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	1.11	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.22	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	QLENX	COAGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.50%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.09%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-7.09%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.19%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.50%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.53%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.48%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.95%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	QLENX	COAGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.23%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.60%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.23%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.08%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.58%	—	—

QLENX vs. COAGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QLENX has a 5.18% expense ratio, which is higher than COAGX's 2.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

QLENX vs. COAGX - Dividend Comparison

QLENX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%, while COAGX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
COAGX Caldwell & Orkin - Gator Capital Long/Short Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.81%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	5.81%
QLENX AQR Long-Short Equity N	1.64%	1.64%	7.13%	21.21%	14.09%	0.00%	1.59%	0.00%	6.09%	8.91%	2.87%	4.91%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QLENX and COAGX in my portfolio?

QLENX and COAGX have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.