COAGX vs. TQQQ

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

COAGX (Caldwell & Orkin - Gator Capital Long/Short Fund) and TQQQ (ProShares UltraPro QQQ) are both funds - COAGX is a Long-Short fund managed by Caldwell & Orkin, while TQQQ is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index (300%). A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. COAGX charges 2.00%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for TQQQ.

Performance

COAGX vs. TQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Caldwell & Orkin - Gator Capital Long/Short Fund (COAGX) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

COAGX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TQQQ

• 1D: -1.53%
• 1M: -5.83%
• YTD: 39.27%
• 6M: 32.62%
• 1Y: 89.02%
• 3Y*: 57.21%
• 5Y*: 21.17%
• 10Y*: 45.25%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

COAGX vs. TQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
COAGX Caldwell & Orkin - Gator Capital Long/Short Fund	3.61%	17.44%	35.58%	31.98%	-7.18%	27.17%	11.06%	24.20%	-15.53%	0.93%
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ	39.27%	34.35%	58.27%	198.04%	-79.09%	82.98%	110.05%	133.84%	-19.79%	118.06%

Correlation

The correlation between COAGX and TQQQ is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.31
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.50
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.56
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.53
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2010	0.51

The correlation between COAGX and TQQQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (1 year) to 0.56 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

COAGX vs. TQQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

COAGX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

TQQQ

TQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 51
TQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
TQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
TQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 48
TQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
TQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 49

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

COAGX vs. TQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Caldwell & Orkin - Gator Capital Long/Short Fund (COAGX) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	COAGX	TQQQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.68	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.11	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.28	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.42	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	7.68	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	COAGX	TQQQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-81.66%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-36.97%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-58.04%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-81.66%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-81.66%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-15.96%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-18.49%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	11.64%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	COAGX	TQQQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	27.27%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	43.24%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	53.35%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	67.41%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	66.31%	—

COAGX vs. TQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

COAGX has a 2.00% expense ratio, which is higher than TQQQ's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

COAGX vs. TQQQ - Dividend Comparison

COAGX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
COAGX Caldwell & Orkin - Gator Capital Long/Short Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.81%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	5.81%
TQQQ ProShares UltraPro QQQ	0.43%	0.65%	1.27%	1.26%	0.57%	0.00%	0.00%	0.06%	0.11%	0.00%	0.00%	0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both COAGX and TQQQ in my portfolio?

COAGX and TQQQ have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.