PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QLENX vs. CLOA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QLENX vs. CLOA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AQR Long-Short Equity N (QLENX) and BlackRock AAA CLO ETF (CLOA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QLENX achieves a 0.29% return, which is significantly lower than CLOA's 2.06% return.


QLENX

1D
-0.19%
1M
3.51%
YTD
0.29%
6M
4.65%
1Y
15.75%
3Y*
27.39%
5Y*
21.63%
10Y*
11.73%

CLOA

1D
0.02%
1M
0.44%
YTD
2.06%
6M
2.51%
1Y
5.28%
3Y*
6.74%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QLENX vs. CLOA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
QLENX
AQR Long-Short Equity N
0.29%34.07%30.18%22.30%
CLOA
BlackRock AAA CLO ETF
2.06%5.44%7.25%8.38%

Correlation

The correlation between QLENX and CLOA is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2023

0.08

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QLENX vs. CLOA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QLENX
QLENX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
QLENX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QLENX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
QLENX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
QLENX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
QLENX Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

CLOA
CLOA Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
CLOA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLOA Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLOA Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
CLOA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLOA Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QLENX vs. CLOA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR Long-Short Equity N (QLENX) and BlackRock AAA CLO ETF (CLOA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QLENXCLOADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-5.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-10.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

3.34

-1.94

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.62

30.02

-27.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.18

150.47

-142.29

QLENX vs. CLOA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QLENX Sharpe Ratio is 2.21, which is lower than the CLOA Sharpe Ratio of 7.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QLENX and CLOA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QLENXCLOADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.21

7.45

-5.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

2.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.22

5.22

-4.00

Drawdowns

QLENX vs. CLOA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QLENX drawdown since its inception was -38.50%, which is greater than CLOA's maximum drawdown of -1.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLENX and CLOA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QLENXCLOADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.50%

-1.34%

-37.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.09%

-0.18%

-5.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.09%

-1.13%

-5.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.34%

0.00%

-0.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.48%

-0.05%

-7.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.95%

0.04%

+1.91%

Volatility

QLENX vs. CLOA - Volatility Comparison

AQR Long-Short Equity N (QLENX) has a higher volatility of 2.21% compared to BlackRock AAA CLO ETF (CLOA) at 0.15%. This indicates that QLENX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLOA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QLENXCLOADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.21%

0.15%

+2.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.60%

0.48%

+5.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.27%

0.71%

+6.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.08%

1.32%

+8.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.59%

1.32%

+9.27%

QLENX vs. CLOA - Expense Ratio Comparison

QLENX has a 5.18% expense ratio, which is higher than CLOA's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

QLENX vs. CLOA - Dividend Comparison

QLENX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, less than CLOA's 4.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CLOA
BlackRock AAA CLO ETF
4.96%5.35%6.01%5.88%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QLENX
AQR Long-Short Equity N
1.63%1.64%7.13%21.21%14.09%0.00%1.59%0.00%6.09%8.91%2.87%4.91%

Frequently Asked Questions


QLENX and CLOA have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QLENX has higher volatility (2.21%) compared to CLOA (0.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QLENX dropped -38.50% vs CLOA's -1.34%.

CLOA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.45 vs 2.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QLENX and CLOA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer