QLENX vs. CBLS
QLENX (AQR Long-Short Equity N) and CBLS (Changebridge Capital Long/Short Equity ETF) are both Long-Short funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, QLENX returned 21.63%/yr vs 5.59%/yr for CBLS. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QLENX charges 5.18%/yr vs 1.95%/yr for CBLS.
Performance
QLENX vs. CBLS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QLENX achieves a 0.29% return, which is significantly lower than CBLS's 24.21% return.
QLENX
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 3.51%
- YTD
- 0.29%
- 6M
- 4.65%
- 1Y
- 15.75%
- 3Y*
- 27.39%
- 5Y*
- 21.63%
- 10Y*
- 11.73%
CBLS
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 8.64%
- YTD
- 24.21%
- 6M
- 22.60%
- 1Y
- 21.18%
- 3Y*
- 19.87%
- 5Y*
- 5.59%
- 10Y*
- —
QLENX vs. CBLS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QLENX AQR Long-Short Equity N | 0.29% | 34.07% | 30.18% | 23.67% | 18.92% | 30.70% | 2.93% |
CBLS Changebridge Capital Long/Short Equity ETF | 24.21% | 5.87% | 28.74% | -2.67% | -11.64% | 2.85% | 14.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between QLENX and CBLS is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2020 | 0.26 |
The correlation between QLENX and CBLS shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (1 year) to 0.33 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QLENX vs. CBLS — Risk / Return Rank
QLENX
CBLS
QLENX vs. CBLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR Long-Short Equity N (QLENX) and Changebridge Capital Long/Short Equity ETF (CBLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QLENX | CBLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.25 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.62 | 2.61 | +0.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.18 | 6.36 | +1.82 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QLENX | CBLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.21 | 1.39 | +0.81 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 2.16 | 0.36 | +1.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.11 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.22 | 0.63 | +0.59 |
Drawdowns
QLENX vs. CBLS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QLENX drawdown since its inception was -38.50%, which is greater than CBLS's maximum drawdown of -32.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLENX and CBLS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QLENX | CBLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.50% | -32.78% | -5.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.09% | -8.15% | +2.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.09% | -15.27% | +8.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.19% | -31.24% | +14.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.50% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.34% | 0.00% | -0.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.48% | -12.79% | +5.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.95% | 3.34% | -1.39% |
Volatility
QLENX vs. CBLS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AQR Long-Short Equity N (QLENX) is 2.21%, while Changebridge Capital Long/Short Equity ETF (CBLS) has a volatility of 7.07%. This indicates that QLENX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CBLS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QLENX | CBLS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.21% | 7.07% | -4.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.60% | 12.56% | -6.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.27% | 15.27% | -8.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.08% | 15.64% | -5.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.59% | 16.13% | -5.54% |
QLENX vs. CBLS - Expense Ratio Comparison
QLENX has a 5.18% expense ratio, which is higher than CBLS's 1.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
QLENX vs. CBLS - Dividend Comparison
QLENX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, more than CBLS's 0.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBLS Changebridge Capital Long/Short Equity ETF | 0.72% | 0.90% | 0.73% | 0.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QLENX AQR Long-Short Equity N | 1.63% | 1.64% | 7.13% | 21.21% | 14.09% | 0.00% | 1.59% | 0.00% | 6.09% | 8.91% | 2.87% | 4.91% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QLENX and CBLS have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CBLS has higher volatility (7.07%) compared to QLENX (2.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QLENX dropped -38.50% vs CBLS's -32.78%.
QLENX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QLENX and CBLS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer