PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QLENX vs. CBLS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QLENX vs. CBLS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AQR Long-Short Equity N (QLENX) and Changebridge Capital Long/Short Equity ETF (CBLS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QLENX achieves a 0.29% return, which is significantly lower than CBLS's 24.21% return.


QLENX

1D
-0.19%
1M
3.51%
YTD
0.29%
6M
4.65%
1Y
15.75%
3Y*
27.39%
5Y*
21.63%
10Y*
11.73%

CBLS

1D
0.04%
1M
8.64%
YTD
24.21%
6M
22.60%
1Y
21.18%
3Y*
19.87%
5Y*
5.59%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QLENX vs. CBLS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
QLENX
AQR Long-Short Equity N
0.29%34.07%30.18%23.67%18.92%30.70%2.93%
CBLS
Changebridge Capital Long/Short Equity ETF
24.21%5.87%28.74%-2.67%-11.64%2.85%14.15%

Correlation

The correlation between QLENX and CBLS is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2020

0.26

The correlation between QLENX and CBLS shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (1 year) to 0.33 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QLENX vs. CBLS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QLENX
QLENX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
QLENX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QLENX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
QLENX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
QLENX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
QLENX Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

CBLS
CBLS Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
CBLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBLS Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
CBLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBLS Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QLENX vs. CBLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR Long-Short Equity N (QLENX) and Changebridge Capital Long/Short Equity ETF (CBLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QLENXCBLSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.25

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.62

2.61

+0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.18

6.36

+1.82

QLENX vs. CBLS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QLENX Sharpe Ratio is 2.21, which is higher than the CBLS Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QLENX and CBLS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QLENXCBLSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.21

1.39

+0.81

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

2.16

0.36

+1.80

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.22

0.63

+0.59

Drawdowns

QLENX vs. CBLS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QLENX drawdown since its inception was -38.50%, which is greater than CBLS's maximum drawdown of -32.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLENX and CBLS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QLENXCBLSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.50%

-32.78%

-5.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.09%

-8.15%

+2.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.09%

-15.27%

+8.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.19%

-31.24%

+14.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.34%

0.00%

-0.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.48%

-12.79%

+5.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.95%

3.34%

-1.39%

Volatility

QLENX vs. CBLS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AQR Long-Short Equity N (QLENX) is 2.21%, while Changebridge Capital Long/Short Equity ETF (CBLS) has a volatility of 7.07%. This indicates that QLENX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CBLS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QLENXCBLSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.21%

7.07%

-4.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.60%

12.56%

-6.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.27%

15.27%

-8.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.08%

15.64%

-5.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.59%

16.13%

-5.54%

QLENX vs. CBLS - Expense Ratio Comparison

QLENX has a 5.18% expense ratio, which is higher than CBLS's 1.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

QLENX vs. CBLS - Dividend Comparison

QLENX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, more than CBLS's 0.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CBLS
Changebridge Capital Long/Short Equity ETF
0.72%0.90%0.73%0.44%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QLENX
AQR Long-Short Equity N
1.63%1.64%7.13%21.21%14.09%0.00%1.59%0.00%6.09%8.91%2.87%4.91%

Frequently Asked Questions


QLENX and CBLS have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CBLS has higher volatility (7.07%) compared to QLENX (2.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QLENX dropped -38.50% vs CBLS's -32.78%.

QLENX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QLENX and CBLS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer