QLDY vs. VGUS
QLDY (Defiance Nasdaq 100 LightningSpread Income ETF) and VGUS (Vanguard Ultra-Short Treasury ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QLDY is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Defiance, while VGUS is a Ultrashort Bond fund tracking the Bloomberg Short Treasury Index. QLDY is actively managed, while VGUS is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.07, they often move in opposite directions. QLDY charges 1.04%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for VGUS.
Performance
QLDY vs. VGUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QLDY achieves a 12.52% return, which is significantly higher than VGUS's 1.61% return.
QLDY
- 1D
- -3.02%
- 1M
- -1.79%
- YTD
- 12.52%
- 6M
- 10.50%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VGUS
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.20%
- YTD
- 1.61%
- 6M
- 1.69%
- 1Y
- 3.85%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QLDY vs. VGUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QLDY Defiance Nasdaq 100 LightningSpread Income ETF | 12.52% | 1.54% |
VGUS Vanguard Ultra-Short Treasury ETF | 1.61% | 1.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between QLDY and VGUS is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2025 | -0.07 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QLDY vs. VGUS — Risk / Return Rank
QLDY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
VGUS
QLDY vs. VGUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Nasdaq 100 LightningSpread Income ETF (QLDY) and Vanguard Ultra-Short Treasury ETF (VGUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QLDY | VGUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 10.49 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 53.13 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 402.18 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QLDY vs. VGUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QLDY drawdown since its inception was -17.44%, which is greater than VGUS's maximum drawdown of -0.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLDY and VGUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QLDY | VGUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.44% | -0.07% | -17.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.63% | 0.00% | -5.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.23% | -0.00% | -4.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.01% | — |
Volatility
QLDY vs. VGUS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QLDY | VGUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.11% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.18% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.34% | 0.33% | +21.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.34% | 0.34% | +21.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.34% | 0.34% | +21.00% |
QLDY vs. VGUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
QLDY has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is higher than VGUS's 0.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
QLDY vs. VGUS - Dividend Comparison
QLDY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 24.21%, more than VGUS's 3.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
QLDY Defiance Nasdaq 100 LightningSpread Income ETF | 24.21% | 9.34% |
VGUS Vanguard Ultra-Short Treasury ETF | 3.60% | 3.12% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QLDY and VGUS have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VGUS is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VGUS is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 1.04% for QLDY.
QLDY has the higher dividend yield at 24.21%, compared with 3.60% for VGUS.
QLDY is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while VGUS is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 1.04% for QLDY and 0.07% for VGUS.
Find the right allocation for QLDY and VGUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer