QLDY vs. SPY
QLDY (Defiance Nasdaq 100 LightningSpread Income ETF) and SPY (State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QLDY is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Defiance, while SPY is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. QLDY is actively managed, while SPY is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QLDY charges 1.04%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for SPY.
Performance
QLDY vs. SPY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QLDY achieves a 10.66% return, which is significantly higher than SPY's 8.10% return.
QLDY
- 1D
- -1.66%
- 1M
- -3.42%
- YTD
- 10.66%
- 6M
- 8.32%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPY
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- -1.41%
- YTD
- 8.10%
- 6M
- 6.77%
- 1Y
- 22.18%
- 3Y*
- 20.66%
- 5Y*
- 12.96%
- 10Y*
- 15.53%
QLDY vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QLDY Defiance Nasdaq 100 LightningSpread Income ETF | 10.66% | 1.54% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 8.10% | 4.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between QLDY and SPY is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2025 | 0.93 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QLDY vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank
QLDY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SPY
QLDY vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Nasdaq 100 LightningSpread Income ETF (QLDY) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QLDY | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.33 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.51 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 11.15 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QLDY vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QLDY drawdown since its inception was -17.44%, smaller than the maximum SPY drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLDY and SPY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QLDY | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.44% | -55.19% | +37.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.88% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.76% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.50% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.20% | -3.22% | -3.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.24% | -9.03% | +4.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.99% | — |
Volatility
QLDY vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QLDY | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.85% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.81% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.38% | 12.47% | +8.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.38% | 17.15% | +4.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.38% | 17.95% | +3.43% |
QLDY vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison
QLDY has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
QLDY vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison
QLDY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 24.62%, more than SPY's 1.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QLDY Defiance Nasdaq 100 LightningSpread Income ETF | 24.62% | 9.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 1.03% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.40% | 1.65% | 1.20% | 1.52% | 1.75% | 2.04% | 1.80% | 2.03% | 2.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, QLDY and SPY move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, SPY is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPY is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 1.04% for QLDY.
QLDY has the higher dividend yield at 24.62%, compared with 1.03% for SPY.
QLDY is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while SPY is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Defiance and State Street. Their fees differ too: 1.04% for QLDY and 0.09% for SPY.
Find the right allocation for QLDY and SPY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer