QLC vs. HYGV

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

QLC (FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund) and HYGV (FlexShares High Yield Value-Scored US Bond Index Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - QLC is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Northern Trust Quality Large Cap Index, while HYGV is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the Northern Trust High Yield Value-Scored US Corporate Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QLC returned 15.29%/yr vs 3.49%/yr for HYGV. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QLC charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.37%/yr for HYGV.

Performance

QLC vs. HYGV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund (QLC) and FlexShares High Yield Value-Scored US Bond Index Fund (HYGV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QLC achieves a 11.39% return, which is significantly higher than HYGV's 1.42% return.

QLC

• 1D: -0.74%
• 1M: 5.38%
• YTD: 11.39%
• 6M: 11.88%
• 1Y: 33.09%
• 3Y*: 25.39%
• 5Y*: 15.29%
• 10Y*: 14.83%

HYGV

• 1D: -0.24%
• 1M: 0.33%
• YTD: 1.42%
• 6M: 1.66%
• 1Y: 6.94%
• 3Y*: 8.38%
• 5Y*: 3.49%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QLC vs. HYGV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
QLC FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund	11.39%	23.26%	26.71%	26.02%	-17.21%	28.46%	13.64%	24.51%	-12.90%
HYGV FlexShares High Yield Value-Scored US Bond Index Fund	1.42%	7.92%	8.02%	12.11%	-12.60%	5.93%	8.01%	15.76%	-4.15%

Correlation

The correlation between QLC and HYGV is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.75
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.67
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.72
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 2018	0.71

The correlation between QLC and HYGV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

QLC vs. HYGV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QLC	HYGV
Technology	34.8%	-
Financial Services	13.8%	-
Communication Services	13.8%	-
Healthcare	10.1%	-
Consumer Cyclical	7.9%	-
Industrials	6.6%	-
Utilities	3.4%	-
Consumer Defensive	3.2%	-
Real Estate	2.3%	-
Basic Materials	2.2%	-
Energy	2.0%	100.0%

Return for Risk

QLC vs. HYGV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QLC

QLC Risk / Return Rank: 81
QLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
QLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
QLC Omega Ratio Rank: 80
QLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
QLC Martin Ratio Rank: 85

HYGV

HYGV Risk / Return Rank: 56
HYGV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
HYGV Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
HYGV Omega Ratio Rank: 56
HYGV Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
HYGV Martin Ratio Rank: 62

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QLC vs. HYGV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund (QLC) and FlexShares High Yield Value-Scored US Bond Index Fund (HYGV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QLC	HYGV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.69	1.81	+0.88
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.71	2.79	+0.92
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.48	1.35	+0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.76	2.60	+1.16
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.59	11.22	+6.38
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QLC vs. HYGV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QLC Sharpe Ratio is 2.69, which is higher than the HYGV Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QLC and HYGV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QLC	HYGV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.69	1.81	+0.88
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.91	0.46	+0.45
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.81	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.80	0.55	+0.25

Drawdowns

QLC vs. HYGV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QLC drawdown since its inception was -35.86%, which is greater than HYGV's maximum drawdown of -23.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLC and HYGV.

Drawdown Indicators

	QLC	HYGV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.86%	-23.47%	-12.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.84%	-2.68%	-6.16%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.49%	-5.56%	-12.93%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.81%	-17.12%	-6.69%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.86%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.74%	-0.27%	-0.47%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.54%	-3.32%	-1.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.89%	0.62%	+1.27%

Volatility

QLC vs. HYGV - Volatility Comparison

FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund (QLC) has a higher volatility of 2.94% compared to FlexShares High Yield Value-Scored US Bond Index Fund (HYGV) at 1.17%. This indicates that QLC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HYGV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QLC	HYGV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.94%	1.17%	+1.77%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.51%	3.02%	+6.49%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.38%	3.85%	+8.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.82%	7.59%	+9.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.42%	9.20%	+9.22%

QLC vs. HYGV - Expense Ratio Comparison

QLC has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than HYGV's 0.37% expense ratio.

Dividends

QLC vs. HYGV - Dividend Comparison

QLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, less than HYGV's 7.41% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HYGV FlexShares High Yield Value-Scored US Bond Index Fund	7.41%	7.48%	8.20%	8.77%	7.64%	6.07%	6.18%	7.95%	5.63%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QLC FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund	0.88%	0.94%	1.03%	1.26%	1.46%	0.96%	1.40%	1.91%	1.82%	1.29%	1.80%	0.64%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QLC and HYGV in my portfolio?

QLC and HYGV have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QLC or HYGV?

QLC has higher volatility (2.94%) compared to HYGV (1.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QLC dropped -35.86% vs HYGV's -23.47%.

Which ETF is better, QLC or HYGV?

On 5-year performance, QLC leads with 15.29% vs 3.49% for HYGV. On fees, QLC is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, HYGV has been the lower-risk option at 1.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QLC or HYGV?

Over the 5-year period, QLC has performed better with a 15.29% return vs 3.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QLC or HYGV?

QLC is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.37% for HYGV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QLC or HYGV?

HYGV has the higher dividend yield at 7.41%, compared with 0.88% for QLC.

What is the main difference between QLC and HYGV?

QLC is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while HYGV is High Yield Bonds. QLC tracks Northern Trust Quality Large Cap Index, while HYGV tracks Northern Trust High Yield Value-Scored US Corporate Bond Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for QLC and 0.37% for HYGV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QLC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.