QLC vs. DJUN
QLC (FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund) and DJUN (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - June) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - QLC tracks the Northern Trust Quality Large Cap Index while DJUN tracks the Cboe S&P 500 30% (-5% to -35%) Buffer Protect June Series Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QLC returned 15.29%/yr vs 8.19%/yr for DJUN. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QLC charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for DJUN.
Performance
QLC vs. DJUN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QLC achieves a 11.39% return, which is significantly higher than DJUN's 3.78% return.
QLC
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- 5.38%
- YTD
- 11.39%
- 6M
- 11.88%
- 1Y
- 33.09%
- 3Y*
- 25.39%
- 5Y*
- 15.29%
- 10Y*
- 14.83%
DJUN
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.88%
- YTD
- 3.78%
- 6M
- 4.53%
- 1Y
- 10.92%
- 3Y*
- 11.40%
- 5Y*
- 8.19%
- 10Y*
- —
QLC vs. DJUN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QLC FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund | 11.39% | 23.26% | 26.71% | 26.02% | -17.21% | 28.46% | 19.98% |
DJUN FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - June | 3.78% | 9.38% | 13.92% | 17.58% | -6.30% | 6.27% | 6.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between QLC and DJUN is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2020 | 0.91 |
The correlation between QLC and DJUN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QLC vs. DJUN — Risk / Return Rank
QLC
DJUN
QLC vs. DJUN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund (QLC) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - June (DJUN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QLC | DJUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.50 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.76 | 3.51 | +0.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.59 | 20.66 | -3.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QLC | DJUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.69 | 2.22 | +0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 | 0.97 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.81 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.80 | 1.04 | -0.24 |
Drawdowns
QLC vs. DJUN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QLC drawdown since its inception was -35.86%, which is greater than DJUN's maximum drawdown of -11.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLC and DJUN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QLC | DJUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.86% | -11.96% | -23.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.84% | -3.15% | -5.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.49% | -11.96% | -6.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.81% | -11.96% | -11.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.86% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.74% | 0.00% | -0.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.54% | -1.59% | -2.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.89% | 0.53% | +1.36% |
Volatility
QLC vs. DJUN - Volatility Comparison
FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund (QLC) has a higher volatility of 2.94% compared to FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - June (DJUN) at 0.25%. This indicates that QLC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DJUN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QLC | DJUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.94% | 0.25% | +2.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.51% | 3.55% | +5.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.38% | 5.04% | +7.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.82% | 8.52% | +8.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.42% | 8.06% | +10.36% |
QLC vs. DJUN - Expense Ratio Comparison
QLC has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than DJUN's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
QLC vs. DJUN - Dividend Comparison
QLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, while DJUN has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DJUN FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - June | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QLC FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund | 0.88% | 0.94% | 1.03% | 1.26% | 1.46% | 0.96% | 1.40% | 1.91% | 1.82% | 1.29% | 1.80% | 0.64% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QLC and DJUN have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QLC has higher volatility (2.94%) compared to DJUN (0.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QLC dropped -35.86% vs DJUN's -11.96%.
On 5-year performance, QLC leads with 15.29% vs 8.19% for DJUN. On fees, QLC is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, DJUN has been the lower-risk option at 0.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QLC has performed better with a 15.29% return vs 8.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QLC is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DJUN.
QLC has the higher dividend yield at 0.88%, compared with 0.00% for DJUN.
QLC tracks Northern Trust Quality Large Cap Index, while DJUN tracks Cboe S&P 500 30% (-5% to -35%) Buffer Protect June Series Index. They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for QLC and 0.85% for DJUN.
QLC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs 2.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QLC and DJUN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer