QKACX vs. MUHLX

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

QKACX (Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund Class R6) and MUHLX (Muhlenkamp Fund) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, QKACX returned 16.79%/yr vs 10.39%/yr for MUHLX. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QKACX charges 0.73%/yr vs 1.14%/yr for MUHLX.

Performance

QKACX vs. MUHLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund Class R6 (QKACX) and Muhlenkamp Fund (MUHLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

As of year-to-date, both investments have demonstrated similar returns, with QKACX at 8.33% and MUHLX at 8.33%. Over the past 10 years, QKACX has outperformed MUHLX with an annualized return of 16.79%, while MUHLX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.39% annualized return.

QKACX

• 1D: 0.13%
• 1M: 2.96%
• 6M: 7.25%
• YTD: 8.33%
• 1Y: 17.68%
• 3Y*: 23.29%
• 5Y*: 15.08%
• 10Y*: 16.79%

MUHLX

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: -1.58%
• 6M: 2.79%
• YTD: 8.33%
• 1Y: 17.16%
• 3Y*: 11.19%
• 5Y*: 10.79%
• 10Y*: 10.39%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QKACX vs. MUHLX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
QKACX Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund Class R6	8.33%	21.16%	31.05%	23.55%	-14.17%	31.45%	22.00%	26.88%	-2.65%	21.15%
MUHLX Muhlenkamp Fund	8.33%	17.82%	3.38%	13.92%	2.89%	28.98%	11.96%	14.39%	-13.29%	18.78%

Correlation

The correlation between QKACX and MUHLX is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.19
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.45
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.61
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.72
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2007	0.84

Over the past year, the correlation between QKACX and MUHLX has dropped to 0.19 - well below their long-term average of 0.84, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

QKACX vs. MUHLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QKACX

QKACX Risk / Return Rank: 48
QKACX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
QKACX Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
QKACX Omega Ratio Rank: 51
QKACX Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
QKACX Martin Ratio Rank: 58

MUHLX

MUHLX Risk / Return Rank: 29
MUHLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
MUHLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
MUHLX Omega Ratio Rank: 27
MUHLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
MUHLX Martin Ratio Rank: 30

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QKACX vs. MUHLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund Class R6 (QKACX) and Muhlenkamp Fund (MUHLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QKACX	MUHLX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.44	1.17	+0.26
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.09	1.65	+0.44
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.21	+0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.09	1.66	+0.42
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.07	5.28	+3.79

QKACX vs. MUHLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QKACX Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is comparable to the MUHLX Sharpe Ratio of 1.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QKACX and MUHLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QKACX vs. MUHLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QKACX drawdown since its inception was -60.51%, roughly equal to the maximum MUHLX drawdown of -62.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QKACX and MUHLX.

Drawdown Indicators

	QKACX	MUHLX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-60.51%	-62.05%	+1.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.66%	-10.23%	+1.57%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.42%	-18.63%	-0.79%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.05%	-18.63%	-4.42%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.47%	-40.85%	+4.38%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-6.32%	+6.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.15%	-10.76%	-0.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.99%	3.22%	-1.23%

Volatility

QKACX vs. MUHLX - Volatility Comparison

Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund Class R6 (QKACX) and Muhlenkamp Fund (MUHLX) have volatilities of 3.91% and 3.82%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QKACX	MUHLX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.91%	3.82%	+0.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.06%	10.99%	-0.93%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.60%	14.52%	-1.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.43%	14.59%	+2.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.62%	17.03%	+1.59%

QKACX vs. MUHLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QKACX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is lower than MUHLX's 1.14% expense ratio.

Dividends

QKACX vs. MUHLX - Dividend Comparison

QKACX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.36%, more than MUHLX's 3.08% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MUHLX Muhlenkamp Fund	3.08%	3.34%	0.58%	0.89%	6.80%	7.77%	10.28%	1.26%	14.70%	4.30%	0.00%	11.02%
QKACX Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund Class R6	4.36%	4.72%	8.90%	1.45%	11.20%	17.85%	3.09%	3.41%	8.83%	0.74%	0.00%	0.52%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QKACX and MUHLX in my portfolio?

QKACX and MUHLX have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QKACX or MUHLX?

QKACX has higher volatility (3.91%) compared to MUHLX (3.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QKACX dropped -60.51% vs MUHLX's -62.05%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QKACX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs 1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.