QKACX vs. MUHLX

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund Class R6 (QKACX) and Muhlenkamp Fund (MUHLX).

QKACX is an actively managed fund by Federated Hermes. It was launched on Oct 1, 2002. MUHLX is managed by Muhlenkamp. It was launched on Nov 1, 1988.

Performance

QKACX vs. MUHLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund Class R6 (QKACX) and Muhlenkamp Fund (MUHLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

QKACX vs. MUHLX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
QKACX Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund Class R6	-4.88%	21.16%	31.05%	23.55%	-14.17%	31.45%	22.00%	26.88%	-2.65%	21.15%
MUHLX Muhlenkamp Fund	9.11%	17.82%	3.38%	13.92%	2.89%	28.98%	11.96%	14.39%	-13.29%	18.78%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QKACX achieves a -4.88% return, which is significantly lower than MUHLX's 9.11% return. Over the past 10 years, QKACX has outperformed MUHLX with an annualized return of 15.56%, while MUHLX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.68% annualized return.

QKACX

• 1D: 3.04%
• 1M: -4.68%
• YTD: -4.88%
• 6M: -1.60%
• 1Y: 18.57%
• 3Y*: 20.53%
• 5Y*: 14.46%
• 10Y*: 15.56%

MUHLX

• 1D: 2.42%
• 1M: -5.65%
• YTD: 9.11%
• 6M: 10.37%
• 1Y: 22.96%
• 3Y*: 14.41%
• 5Y*: 12.05%
• 10Y*: 10.68%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QKACX vs. MUHLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QKACX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is lower than MUHLX's 1.14% expense ratio.

MUHLX

Muhlenkamp Fund

QKACX

Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund Class R6

Return for Risk

QKACX vs. MUHLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QKACX

QKACX Risk / Return Rank: 61
QKACX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
QKACX Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
QKACX Omega Ratio Rank: 69
QKACX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
QKACX Martin Ratio Rank: 69

MUHLX

MUHLX Risk / Return Rank: 77
MUHLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
MUHLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
MUHLX Omega Ratio Rank: 69
MUHLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
MUHLX Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QKACX vs. MUHLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund Class R6 (QKACX) and Muhlenkamp Fund (MUHLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QKACX	MUHLX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.15	1.42	-0.27
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.67	1.97	-0.31
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.28	+0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.55	2.37	-0.82
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.54	8.57	-1.03
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QKACX vs. MUHLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QKACX Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is comparable to the MUHLX Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QKACX and MUHLX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QKACX	MUHLX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.15	1.42	-0.27
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.84	0.82	+0.02
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.83	0.63	+0.20
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.45	0.51	-0.06

Correlation

The correlation between QKACX and MUHLX is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

QKACX vs. MUHLX - Dividend Comparison

QKACX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.96%, more than MUHLX's 3.06% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QKACX Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund Class R6	4.96%	4.72%	8.90%	1.45%	11.20%	17.85%	3.09%	3.41%	8.83%	0.74%	0.00%	0.52%
MUHLX Muhlenkamp Fund	3.06%	3.34%	0.58%	0.89%	6.80%	7.77%	10.28%	1.26%	14.70%	4.30%	0.00%	11.02%

Drawdowns

QKACX vs. MUHLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QKACX drawdown since its inception was -60.51%, roughly equal to the maximum MUHLX drawdown of -62.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QKACX and MUHLX.

Drawdown Indicators

	QKACX	MUHLX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-60.51%	-62.05%	+1.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.99%	-10.23%	-1.76%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.05%	-18.63%	-4.42%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.47%	-40.85%	+4.38%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.88%	-5.65%	-0.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.30%	-10.81%	-0.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.46%	2.83%	-0.37%

Volatility

QKACX vs. MUHLX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Federated Hermes MDT All Cap Core Fund Class R6 (QKACX) is 5.40%, while Muhlenkamp Fund (MUHLX) has a volatility of 6.01%. This indicates that QKACX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MUHLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QKACX	MUHLX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.40%	6.01%	-0.61%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.95%	12.06%	-2.11%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.19%	16.85%	-0.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.38%	14.77%	+2.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.72%	17.04%	+1.68%