QJUN vs. UNOV

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

QJUN (FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - June) and UNOV (Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - November) are both exchange-traded funds - QJUN is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by First Trust, while UNOV is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 30% (-5% to -35%) Buffer Protect November Series Index. QJUN is actively managed, while UNOV is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, QJUN returned 15.46%/yr vs 10.29%/yr for UNOV. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QJUN charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for UNOV.

Performance

QJUN vs. UNOV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - June (QJUN) and Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - November (UNOV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QJUN achieves a 5.97% return, which is significantly higher than UNOV's 5.56% return.

QJUN

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: 0.99%
• YTD: 5.97%
• 6M: 6.64%
• 1Y: 16.51%
• 3Y*: 15.46%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

UNOV

• 1D: 0.15%
• 1M: 1.93%
• YTD: 5.56%
• 6M: 5.77%
• 1Y: 13.88%
• 3Y*: 10.29%
• 5Y*: 6.71%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QJUN vs. UNOV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
QJUN FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - June	5.97%	13.59%	16.36%	36.34%	-17.34%	7.08%
UNOV Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - November	5.56%	9.92%	9.42%	14.18%	-6.23%	1.46%

Correlation

The correlation between QJUN and UNOV is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.80
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.79
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2021	0.80

The correlation between QJUN and UNOV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

QJUN vs. UNOV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QJUN	UNOV
Technology	54.2%	36.2%
Communication Services	15.5%	10.9%
Consumer Cyclical	12.2%	10.1%
Consumer Defensive	7.6%	4.9%
Healthcare	4.2%	8.4%
Industrials	2.8%	8.1%
Utilities	1.4%	2.3%
Basic Materials	1.2%	1.8%
Energy	0.6%	3.5%
Financial Services	0.2%	11.9%
Real Estate	0.1%	1.9%

Return for Risk

QJUN vs. UNOV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QJUN

QJUN Risk / Return Rank: 70
QJUN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
QJUN Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
QJUN Omega Ratio Rank: 72
QJUN Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
QJUN Martin Ratio Rank: 85

UNOV

UNOV Risk / Return Rank: 77
UNOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
UNOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
UNOV Omega Ratio Rank: 85
UNOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
UNOV Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QJUN vs. UNOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - June (QJUN) and Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - November (UNOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QJUN	UNOV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.08	2.50	-0.42
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.00	3.63	-0.63
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.51	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.20	3.08	+0.12
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.42	15.01	+2.41
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QJUN vs. UNOV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QJUN Sharpe Ratio is 2.08, which is comparable to the UNOV Sharpe Ratio of 2.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QJUN and UNOV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QJUN	UNOV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.08	2.50	-0.42
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.99	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.79	0.92	-0.13

Drawdowns

QJUN vs. UNOV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QJUN drawdown since its inception was -19.92%, which is greater than UNOV's maximum drawdown of -13.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QJUN and UNOV.

Drawdown Indicators

	QJUN	UNOV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.92%	-13.84%	-6.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.18%	-4.52%	-0.66%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.47%	-9.10%	-7.37%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-9.10%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.07%	+0.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.88%	-1.66%	-2.22%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.95%	0.93%	+0.02%

Volatility

QJUN vs. UNOV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - June (QJUN) is 0.31%, while Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - November (UNOV) has a volatility of 1.11%. This indicates that QJUN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UNOV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QJUN	UNOV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.31%	1.11%	-0.80%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.67%	4.67%	+1.00%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.99%	5.58%	+2.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.18%	6.83%	+7.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.18%	7.72%	+6.46%

QJUN vs. UNOV - Expense Ratio Comparison

QJUN has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than UNOV's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

QJUN vs. UNOV - Dividend Comparison

Neither QJUN nor UNOV has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QJUN and UNOV in my portfolio?

QJUN and UNOV have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QJUN or UNOV?

UNOV has higher volatility (1.11%) compared to QJUN (0.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QJUN dropped -19.92% vs UNOV's -13.84%.

Which ETF is better, QJUN or UNOV?

On 3-year performance, QJUN leads with 15.46% vs 10.29% for UNOV. On fees, UNOV is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, QJUN has been the lower-risk option at 0.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QJUN or UNOV?

Over the 3-year period, QJUN has performed better with a 15.46% return vs 10.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QJUN or UNOV?

UNOV is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for QJUN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QJUN or UNOV?

QJUN and UNOV have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between QJUN and UNOV?

QJUN is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while UNOV is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for QJUN and 0.79% for UNOV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

UNOV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 2.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.