QJUN vs. ROBT

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

QJUN (FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - June) and ROBT (First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QJUN is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by First Trust, while ROBT is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq CTA Artificial Intelligence and Robotics Index. QJUN is actively managed, while ROBT is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QJUN returned 10.32%/yr vs -0.15%/yr for ROBT. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QJUN charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for ROBT.

Performance

QJUN vs. ROBT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - June (QJUN) and First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF (ROBT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with QJUN having a 3.39% return and ROBT slightly higher at 3.41%.

QJUN

• 1D: -0.39%
• 1M: -2.20%
• YTD: 3.39%
• 6M: 3.04%
• 1Y: 12.47%
• 3Y*: 14.57%
• 5Y*: 10.32%
• 10Y*: —

ROBT

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: -4.00%
• YTD: 3.41%
• 6M: 1.42%
• 1Y: 14.23%
• 3Y*: 6.91%
• 5Y*: -0.15%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QJUN vs. ROBT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
QJUN FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - June	3.39%	13.59%	16.36%	36.34%	-17.34%	7.57%
ROBT First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF	3.41%	15.16%	-0.41%	27.77%	-34.94%	3.43%

Correlation

The correlation between QJUN and ROBT is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.70
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.75
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.81
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2021	0.81

The correlation between QJUN and ROBT shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (1 year) to 0.81 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

QJUN vs. ROBT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QJUN	ROBT
Technology	58.7%	58.6%
Communication Services	14.3%	3.8%
Consumer Cyclical	11.4%	6.4%
Consumer Defensive	6.4%	1.3%
Healthcare	3.7%	6.9%
Industrials	2.6%	20.1%
Utilities	1.2%	-
Basic Materials	1.0%	-
Energy	0.5%	1.3%
Financial Services	0.2%	1.5%
Real Estate	0.1%	-

Return for Risk

QJUN vs. ROBT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QJUN

QJUN Risk / Return Rank: 61
QJUN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
QJUN Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
QJUN Omega Ratio Rank: 63
QJUN Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
QJUN Martin Ratio Rank: 77

ROBT

ROBT Risk / Return Rank: 18
ROBT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
ROBT Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
ROBT Omega Ratio Rank: 18
ROBT Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
ROBT Martin Ratio Rank: 18

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QJUN vs. ROBT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - June (QJUN) and First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF (ROBT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QJUN	ROBT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.63	0.58	+1.05
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.30	0.94	+1.36
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.11	+0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.42	0.66	+1.76
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.00	1.83	+11.17

QJUN vs. ROBT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QJUN Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is higher than the ROBT Sharpe Ratio of 0.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QJUN and ROBT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QJUN vs. ROBT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QJUN drawdown since its inception was -19.92%, smaller than the maximum ROBT drawdown of -44.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QJUN and ROBT.

Drawdown Indicators

	QJUN	ROBT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.92%	-44.47%	+24.55%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.18%	-21.66%	+16.48%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.47%	-27.68%	+11.21%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.92%	-43.26%	+23.34%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.69%	-11.03%	+8.34%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.84%	-15.91%	+12.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.96%	7.78%	-6.82%

Volatility

QJUN vs. ROBT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - June (QJUN) is 2.05%, while First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF (ROBT) has a volatility of 10.64%. This indicates that QJUN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ROBT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QJUN	ROBT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.05%	10.64%	-8.59%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.88%	19.27%	-13.39%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.73%	24.76%	-17.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.15%	25.48%	-11.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.13%	25.59%	-11.46%

QJUN vs. ROBT - Expense Ratio Comparison

QJUN has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than ROBT's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

QJUN vs. ROBT - Dividend Comparison

Neither QJUN nor ROBT has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
QJUN FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - June	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ROBT First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.68%	0.23%	0.35%	0.06%	0.17%	0.42%	0.44%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QJUN and ROBT in my portfolio?

QJUN and ROBT have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QJUN or ROBT?

ROBT has higher volatility (10.64%) compared to QJUN (2.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QJUN dropped -19.92% vs ROBT's -44.47%.

Which ETF is better, QJUN or ROBT?

On 5-year performance, QJUN leads with 10.32% vs -0.15% for ROBT. On fees, ROBT is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, QJUN has been the lower-risk option at 2.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QJUN or ROBT?

Over the 5-year period, QJUN has performed better with a 10.32% return vs -0.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QJUN or ROBT?

ROBT is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for QJUN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QJUN or ROBT?

QJUN and ROBT have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between QJUN and ROBT?

QJUN is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while ROBT is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for QJUN and 0.65% for ROBT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QJUN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs 0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.