QJUN vs. RDVY

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

QJUN (FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - June) and RDVY (First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QJUN is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by First Trust, while RDVY is a Dividend fund tracking the Nasdaq US Rising Dividend Achievers Index. QJUN is actively managed, while RDVY is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QJUN returned 9.65%/yr vs 12.89%/yr for RDVY. Their 0.69 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. QJUN charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for RDVY.

Performance

QJUN vs. RDVY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - June (QJUN) and First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF (RDVY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QJUN achieves a 1.89% return, which is significantly lower than RDVY's 17.25% return.

QJUN

• 1D: 0.50%
• 1M: -1.99%
• 6M: 1.06%
• YTD: 1.89%
• 1Y: 9.15%
• 3Y*: 12.56%
• 5Y*: 9.65%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 10.07%

RDVY

• 1D: 0.36%
• 1M: 1.19%
• 6M: 12.71%
• YTD: 17.25%
• 1Y: 30.74%
• 3Y*: 19.76%
• 5Y*: 12.89%
• 10Y*: 16.25%
• ALL TIME*: 13.76%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
QJUN FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - June	$1.05M	$2.21M	$2.27M
RDVY First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF	$77.65M	$79.19M	$83.63M

QJUN vs. RDVY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
QJUN FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - June	1.89%	13.59%	16.36%	36.34%	-17.34%	7.57%
RDVY First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF	17.25%	18.90%	16.41%	20.38%	-13.27%	13.25%

Correlation

The correlation between QJUN and RDVY is 0.66, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.66
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.59
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.69
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2021	0.69

The correlation between QJUN and RDVY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

QJUN vs. RDVY - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QJUN	RDVY
Technology	60.9%	19.4%
Communication Services	13.1%	4.2%
Consumer Cyclical	10.7%	11.1%
Consumer Defensive	6.3%	2.8%
Healthcare	3.6%	5.6%
Industrials	2.7%	12.5%
Utilities	1.1%	1.4%
Basic Materials	1.0%	-
Energy	0.5%	2.8%
Financial Services	0.2%	38.9%
Real Estate	0.1%	-

Return for Risk

QJUN vs. RDVY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QJUN

QJUN Risk / Return Rank: 38
QJUN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
QJUN Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
QJUN Omega Ratio Rank: 36
QJUN Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
QJUN Martin Ratio Rank: 49

RDVY

RDVY Risk / Return Rank: 85
RDVY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
RDVY Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
RDVY Omega Ratio Rank: 82
RDVY Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
RDVY Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QJUN vs. RDVY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - June (QJUN) and First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF (RDVY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QJUN	RDVY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.87	2.00	-1.14
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.28	2.87	-1.59
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.35	-0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.19	3.25	-2.05
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.70	13.63	-7.93

QJUN vs. RDVY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QJUN Sharpe Ratio is 0.87, which is lower than the RDVY Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QJUN and RDVY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QJUN vs. RDVY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QJUN drawdown since its inception was -19.92%, smaller than the maximum RDVY drawdown of -40.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QJUN and RDVY.

Drawdown Indicators

	QJUN	RDVY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.92%	-40.60%	+20.68%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.68%	-9.04%	+2.36%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.47%	-19.11%	+2.64%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.92%	-25.32%	+5.40%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-40.60%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.11%	0.00%	-4.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.82%	-4.95%	+1.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.40%	2.15%	-0.75%

Volatility

QJUN vs. RDVY - Volatility Comparison

FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - June (QJUN) has a higher volatility of 4.70% compared to First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF (RDVY) at 3.53%. This indicates that QJUN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RDVY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QJUN	RDVY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.70%	3.53%	+1.17%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.71%	11.46%	-3.75%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.20%	14.65%	-5.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.30%	18.92%	-4.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.18%	21.03%	-6.85%

QJUN vs. RDVY - Expense Ratio Comparison

QJUN has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than RDVY's 0.47% expense ratio.

Dividends

QJUN vs. RDVY - Dividend Comparison

QJUN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RDVY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QJUN FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - June	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RDVY First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF	0.83%	1.11%	1.64%	2.09%	2.21%	1.04%	1.53%	1.55%	1.68%	1.25%	2.07%	2.14%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QJUN and RDVY in my portfolio?

QJUN and RDVY have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QJUN or RDVY?

QJUN has higher volatility (4.70%) compared to RDVY (3.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QJUN dropped -19.92% vs RDVY's -40.60%.

Which ETF is better, QJUN or RDVY?

On 5-year performance, RDVY leads with 12.89% vs 9.65% for QJUN. On fees, RDVY is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, RDVY has been the lower-risk option at 3.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QJUN or RDVY?

Over the 5-year period, RDVY has performed better with a 12.89% return vs 9.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QJUN or RDVY?

RDVY is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for QJUN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QJUN or RDVY?

RDVY has the higher dividend yield at 0.83%, compared with 0.00% for QJUN.

What is the main difference between QJUN and RDVY?

QJUN is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while RDVY is Dividend. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for QJUN and 0.47% for RDVY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RDVY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.